RXF 116610LN VS ZZF 114060 V2S

[stufuse]

They all seem same. Good pics mate.

In places mine isn’t quite vertical yours looks a little better in that regard but it’s not any more refined


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Usernametaken]

I agree, there’s is a difference in hue isn’t there.

There will never be the perfect sub eh, haha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not unless you franken!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Kayatsu1]

Here is mine. Actually does look worse in pics than reality.

Wow that brushing looks horrendous. However watch is very good.

 

[Substar]

Wow that brushing looks horrendous. However watch is very good.

It looks worse in the pics but then it’s only 316 steel! Explains a lot for me. 904 brushes and polished to a far higher lustre and refinement. than 316 generally.
I’ll rebrush and then take the same pic.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[stufuse]

Not unless you franken!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And still they are never perfect. Only Gen will be


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Usernametaken]

And still they are never perfect. Only Gen will be


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bombardier]

This is confusing I thought no date was ZZF V1 and date was ZZF V2s so is RXF is also better than ZZF submariner black date?

 

[mariot]

RFX 116610LN & ZZF.v3 - 3130

in low light the zzf insert is much better (I think is clean factory v3). RXF crystal is amazing very close to the gen! for me, the best bracelet is the rfx with not sharp angles.

 

[Bombardier]

How is RXF like compared to ZZF Submariner Date?

 

[mari115]

How is RXF like compared to ZZF Submariner Date?

idk, you could, you know, read the thread?

 

[didjital7]

My rxf black hole