• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

{*PCTeam*} XF PAM682 Pictorial Review

mysterio

Mythical Poster
Advisor
19/8/08
9,794
864
0
As I explained in the XF PAM305 Pictorial review, having some trouble currently with shipping leadtimes for watches I am planning to review, so I've decided to try and do a picture review. These are pictures taken of the actual watch. For my next review, this is the

Luminor 1950 Submersible 3 Days Automatic Acciaio 42
pam00682-b7.png


The PAM682 was just announced this year in the SIHH (Salon International de la Haute Horlogerie Genève) 2017 held in Geneva, Switzerland and along with its ceramic bezel equipped Rose Gold twin, the PAM684, is Officine Panerai's first 42mm Submersibles, something that those with smaller wrists have been clamoring for. It is a 42mm Submersible with a stainless steel construction with an open caseback that shows its P.9010 movement, which aside from the smaller diameter of the watch, has enabled it to become theoretically thinner (I say this because I have not been able to find any reference stating its actual thickness, although with a smaller case and thinner in-house movement, it is expected to be thinner). As this was just announced barely three months ago, it was hoped but it was not expected to come out so soon. However, the newly announced XF factory has demonstrated its manufacturing capability by coming out with a rep in such a short amount of time. With the proliferation of the 44mm and 47mm submersibles in the replica arena, it surely has arrived in a congested arena. Will its 42mm size be up to standards?

Dial - Black dial with the LUMINOR SUBMERSIBLE text at 12 o'clock and the PANERAI Automatic text at 6 o'clock. Circular hour markers for the majority of the dial with 1 and 2 stick markers at 6 and 12 o'clock respectively. Seconds subdial with the characteristic blue seconds hand for P.9010 equipped watches (although it does not have a P.9000 counterpart like the PAM1312) and date complication window @ 3 o'clock.
7ZogxrU.jpg

Crown and crown guard - Nicely executed crown guard, with the slight chamfers at the sides of the half-moon shape, same as gen (not as prominent as on larger submersibles but it is there). REG T.M. engraving is nicely done and lever pin placement is same as gen although might need some adjustment (looks a little sunk). Crown is a bit skinny but it looks like same as the gen (since it's smaller to match a 42mm watch).
BnqHaLZ.jpg

Bezel - Bezel is nicely brushed. The bezel minute markers from 0-15 are sharp and legible and the circular hour markers aren't prominent nor are they sunk on the bezel. Slight chamfer on both top and bottom sides of the bezel, not as prominent as on bigger subs but it looks like the same as the gen. The cut is clean and it exposes the shiny polished edge underneath contrasting the brushed stainless steel case.
hnM8s5u.jpg

Bezel thickness is slightly smaller than the case, but not by much.
28rhj3s.jpg

Case - Well done case, brushed stainless steel with longer lugs which is expected for P.9010 based movement watches. Here is the shot with the PAM682 as reference. Back of the case has the QR strap change system same as on gen. Caseback is nicely engraved showing the movement underneath.
NKIowHV.jpg

5B6BeIn.jpg
Case width is exactly 42mm, but we weren't expecting any different.
g859ulp.jpg

Movement - It is the new P.9010 movement which in reality is just the A7750 with decorative plates glued on to make it look like the gen P.9010. Fortunately, the placement of the balance wheel for the A7750 is at the same location for the gen movement, which is @11. No misspellings thank goodness. :D
u8WAWBR.jpg

ry1ggRd.jpg

tX2sBmz.jpg]

Lume - This recently has been a discussion item since the first batch of PAM682s had the uniform green lume to match the first picture uploaded by OP in their website. Now it has been updated to show that the P.9010 based submersibles will henceforth have blue lume on the lume pip and the minute hand. So naturally, rep fans were sadenned to know such an easily discoverable tell was missed (although understandably). Well, cheer up, I told you the factory had been contacted and notified of this glaring error. This is the corrected version (this is the very first prototype I'm told but it should be coming out shortly. ;) ). Of course, don't take my word for it, look at the following pictures (one in normal conditions, another taken in the dark). :D
WbTydM7.jpg

CwNgEaM.jpg

So in conclusion, the XF PAM682 looks to be getting its due attention from those who have been clamoring for a 42mm submersible, especially from rep collectors. With fit and finish every bit as good as the other factory releases, this watch at the very least deserves your attention. Definitely at least a first-class rep medium class if we're going to consider the movement (it's very good but it's not 1:1 to gen), maybe even bordering on super rep class.

Thanks for looking! :)
 

davebk

Getting To Know The Place
31/12/15
53
7
8
Terrific review. As someone with smaller wrists, I was excited to see this come from Panerai and even more surprised to see a rep of this so early. Seems like XF is really finding a sweet spot with their sub reps.
 

BuddhistGirafe

I'm Pretty Popular
16/5/13
2,462
8
38
Very excited about this.. needed this on my wrist since it was announced at SIHH.
 

kilowattore

Sales Moderator / Section Moderator
Staff member
Moderator Sales
Section Moderator
Certified
11/5/13
13,963
6,415
113
Italy
Thanks for sharing, looks like a very well made rep. Impressive they did it in so little time.
 

SuperLory

Well-Known Repist
22/10/15
8,455
5,046
113
@mysterio is the man ! I can't wait to have it with me

I tried my best with 47mm subs but they were just too big for me. This will fill a void
 

gsxcbr1

Renowned Member
Certified
8/8/11
591
8
18
Thanks for the write up! I've just ordered one from the first production run with uniform green lume. I actually prefer the consistent lume color so I'm happy I snagged one of the first batch. I had a 243 sub which I loved, but at 44mm it was a little too big for my small wrist. Really happy to add a Pam sub back to the collection and I love the addition of the exhibition case back too.
 

kanok14

Getting To Know The Place
21/12/15
48
0
0
Thanks for such a great review mates...looking forward to have one myself
 

kaniel

Renowned Member
28/10/10
941
14
18
Thanks for the review !!

I'd love to see a pic side by side with a Pam 243 to compare the size and the thickness.

If you have a 243 would be great.

Thanks!!
 

gsxcbr1

Renowned Member
Certified
8/8/11
591
8
18

sogo

Active Member
15/1/13
229
11
0
wait. I ask my TD . you ask Your TD sent compare picture.
243 is out of stock. you Can compare pam682 vs 024 or 048-40mm or 312-44mm
 

mysterio

Mythical Poster
Advisor
19/8/08
9,794
864
0
Thanks for the link. The new 682 definitely looks smaller than than the massive 47mm Pam 305! I am however still curious how the 42mm Pam 682 compares to the 44mm Pam 243 lug to lug. Hopefully the 682 sits noticeably smaller on the wrist.

wait. I ask my TD . you ask Your TD sent compare picture.
243 is out of stock. you Can compare pam682 vs 024 or 048-40mm or 312-44mm

I have the PAM243. I just had to get it from storage. :) The lug to lug distance is 53mm, so it wears a bit smaller than the PAM243, but only by a smidge. The 243 is just fits exactly on my 16cm wrist, meaning the lugs don't extend over the wrist.
 

Therion666

Respected Member
Supporter
Certified
26/12/13
4,613
3,075
113
I must say that I can't remember the last time I was so excited about a Panerai watch, I've lost my interest lately..

I just talked to my TD and he didn't know anything about an updated version and said that it just came out and that he can't believe it's already been updated.

I hope he can source me one soon, I love it!

Thanks for a great review, well done!