- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
{*PCTeam*}The PAM 360 dials–Comparison Gen / H maker V1&V1.2 / Noob / DSN / KUVARSIT
- Thread starter ALE7575
- Start date
- 5/8/12
- 172
- 51
- 28
Thank you, mysterio and ALE!
And I just saw some pictures of PAM360, can anyone tell me this is from H, Noob or KW?
Thanks!
Hi all, first post here. Been reading up and want to say thanks for the info. Lots of work being put in by individuals.
For this 360, is there any other comparison done on the case? I tried the search function but wasn't able to locate any.
For this 360, is there any other comparison done on the case? I tried the search function but wasn't able to locate any.
There is no definitive case comparison. There are individual pictures but without using the same location, light conditions and camera settings, it is impossible to judge the difference in color between the HF V1, HF V1.2, NF and KW PAM360s.
understand that the color would be hard to compare unless you have everything at the same place at the same time.
I was looking for information on the case thickness, lever shape, CG shape etc. As these are Luminors, are the CG shape and thickness the same as the 000?
I was looking for information on the case thickness, lever shape, CG shape etc. As these are Luminors, are the CG shape and thickness the same as the 000?
The lume is a mix made specicially by RCTritec for OP.
Its called 'Old Radium' It is 155U Pantone mixed with a C3.
This is the same mix used on all 'Vintage' or 'Dirty' lume models produced by OP.
IMHO none of these rep dials come close enough to warrant them being anything more than a reasonable replica.
But in addition one dial has been missed.... after the gen it is without debate the best and most accurately produced and finished dial...
None of the rep makers efforts come close. This is produced as per the gen process using gen materials
For your pleasure
Its called 'Old Radium' It is 155U Pantone mixed with a C3.
This is the same mix used on all 'Vintage' or 'Dirty' lume models produced by OP.
IMHO none of these rep dials come close enough to warrant them being anything more than a reasonable replica.
But in addition one dial has been missed.... after the gen it is without debate the best and most accurately produced and finished dial...
None of the rep makers efforts come close. This is produced as per the gen process using gen materials
For your pleasure
Thanks mate
Here is a better pic I took of it You can see thickness, cut outs and galvanic and berlac finish plus berlac letterwork. It is brass
Here is a better pic I took of it
You can see thickness, cut outs and galvanic and berlac finish plus berlac letterwork. It is brass 
- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
Thanks Pete for all your post in PAM Section and especially the posts talking about sausage lume.
I have been always in disagreement and dissatisfied with rep sausage dials. Indeed I have no typical PAM sausage dial in my collection, no PAM 005 no PAM 000 and I have got only PAM 390 or Pam Boutique because I like the appearance of these watches with its “vintage†lume and overall look. But I really disagree with the structure of its lume application.
I was rather calm about this matter, until I saw a post and a pic from you (I don’t remember the concrete forum) with a comment talking about the no correct structure of the rep sausage dials. The pic was as follows:
Then I started again to be bothered with the rep sausage dials.
Making the PAM Boutiques Review I was again in contact with this matter and NOW you start again to remember me this annoying matter.
I think it would be interesting to create a specific thread about this interesting subject, because few people are aware of this matter about sausage lume application and many people think rep makers are very close copying these sausage dials. In this way people are accepting these incorrect dials as the better thing ever made and very gen-like.
As you know makers should change from the beginning the way to build a sausage dial, and they know about that. But we would need to “remember†them this matter in order to get good sausage dials in the future.
If you are willing to start and prepare such a thread I would be willing to help you, if necessary, editing pics, giving my opinions… etc
This would be an interesting thread in order to get correct sausage dials in the future.
Thanks for your kind cooperation
ALE
I have been always in disagreement and dissatisfied with rep sausage dials. Indeed I have no typical PAM sausage dial in my collection, no PAM 005 no PAM 000 and I have got only PAM 390 or Pam Boutique because I like the appearance of these watches with its “vintage†lume and overall look. But I really disagree with the structure of its lume application.
I was rather calm about this matter, until I saw a post and a pic from you (I don’t remember the concrete forum) with a comment talking about the no correct structure of the rep sausage dials. The pic was as follows:
Then I started again to be bothered with the rep sausage dials.
Making the PAM Boutiques Review I was again in contact with this matter and NOW you start again to remember me this annoying matter.
I think it would be interesting to create a specific thread about this interesting subject, because few people are aware of this matter about sausage lume application and many people think rep makers are very close copying these sausage dials. In this way people are accepting these incorrect dials as the better thing ever made and very gen-like.
As you know makers should change from the beginning the way to build a sausage dial, and they know about that. But we would need to “remember†them this matter in order to get good sausage dials in the future.
If you are willing to start and prepare such a thread I would be willing to help you, if necessary, editing pics, giving my opinions… etc
This would be an interesting thread in order to get correct sausage dials in the future.
Thanks for your kind cooperation
ALE
Thanks Pete for all your post in PAM Section and especially the posts talking about sausage lume.
I have been always in disagreement and dissatisfied with rep sausage dials. Indeed I have no typical PAM sausage dial in my collection, no PAM 005 no PAM 000 and I have got only PAM 390 or Pam Boutique because I like the appearance of these watches with its “vintage†lume and overall look. But I really disagree with the structure of its lume application.
I was rather calm about this matter, until I saw a post and a pic from you (I don’t remember the concrete forum) with a comment talking about the no correct structure of the rep sausage dials. The pic was as follows:
Then I started again to be bothered with the rep sausage dials.
Making the PAM Boutiques Review I was again in contact with this matter and NOW you start again to remember me this annoying matter.
I think it would be interesting to create a specific thread about this interesting subject, because few people are aware of this matter about sausage lume application and many people think rep makers are very close copying these sausage dials. In this way people are accepting these incorrect dials as the better thing ever made and very gen-like.
As you know makers should change from the beginning the way to build a sausage dial, and they know about that. But we would need to “remember†them this matter in order to get good sausage dials in the future.
If you are willing to start and prepare such a thread I would be willing to help you, if necessary, editing pics, giving my opinions… etc
This would be an interesting thread in order to get correct sausage dials in the future.
Thanks for your kind cooperation
ALE
That's a Gen? Those CG corners look less than sharp...
From the PAM gens I've seen, not all of them have sharp CG-corners. It differs from model to model, and even from year to year - like the PANER AI, the reflection/colour hue of the sapphire etc.
