- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
ALE,
Edited the post for clarity.
Here is a shot of my rep "in the wild"
Thanks mvyz dfor the pics
I think it is well spotted the matter about external radius. The gen has a smoother starting of radius from the bezel
ALE,
Edited the post for clarity.
Here is a shot of my rep "in the wild"
mitchbaria = complete noob to Pams!
I believe the answer should be ship but just so I'm not sorry later: YEA or NAY?
Concerning distortion this is one of the best ever seen. Isn't it?
ALE
Agreed, from these few pics it looks great. Have to have more angles to see more details, but mitchbaria you will be very happy with this!
This pic is the first i received from pure time, i rejected it due to the distortion.
View attachment 13073
The second is the latest one i received, i then accepted.
View attachment 13074
Your thoughts??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wrong decision. First was fine, the second has a defect.
If you read the thread from the beginning, you can see discussion of the same defect.
Hi,
I too just recieved QC pics for my PAM127. Could I get some comments regarding the crystal distortion? Greatly appreciate the help. Thanks.
In addition, is the 8 secs a day rate okay?
Concerning distortion this is one of the best ever seen. Isn't it?
ALE
Hi,
I too just recieved QC pics for my PAM127. Could I get some comments regarding the crystal distortion? Greatly appreciate the help. Thanks.
In addition, is the 8 secs a day rate okay?
Just wondering what the final word is on the crystal distortion issue? I have heard that a new noob batch is currently in the works, can anyone verify that? A few of the dealers have told me that they are out of stock but one TD has a few and sent me these QC pics. From what Ive read on the forums it seems like the crystal distortion looks pretty good. Can anyone confirm or offer their opinion? Thanks.