• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

PAM000 XF

Badola123

Do not accept unsolicited offers
22/10/13
6
0
0
Well.. If you sell hige priced gens or bang for buck reps I still would like a little bit of service, communications and speed in dispatching a paid and approved watch. But thats just me. Why they would want to not ship out ready orders and make space for new ones is beyond me.
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
Guys, I know sometimes it takes longer than a week but in this hobby patience is required. Once I receive mine I still have to send it to get serviced and relumed because I want the best zero I can get my hands on for 10% of the gen cost. Maybe the TD's are confronting a low production/ high demand issue...

who do you recommend for Sausage relume?
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
Strodda
VAC

I thought I read somewhere he only does Sandwich dial and not Sausage? I'll reach out to him and ask. Thanks!

@Vicar69 Thanks!

Anyone have Pics to post of a Sausage relume? See if the lume is flat and slightly recessed (gen-like) or is it bulging out ?
 

SBM

Active Member
DO NOT TRADE WITH ME
25/1/17
413
62
28
Arrived!!!

Martu-strap on aswell.
I'm in love
871d13c5891b388c35dfa5d11d0fbb1f.jpg
9ba09d86b31b30a11905458e02831079.jpg
8f46f62ddc102af47edf82e009c79123.jpg
8901b5ee6bb2c6f3f07cbdc56ba5dace.jpg
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
The case shape is too round ! Compare with a gen 000 and you will see. Also the open 6 and 9 are not as smoothly curved as the gen, sausage dials are very hard to replicate vs for example the very similar sandwiched dial 112! With that being said this is not a "fantastic rep" as many gen Panerai fans will quickly be able to spot these known rep flaws! I'd get a 112 instead , just my 2c.

The 3 is very good, the 6 is so so, the 9 is laughable ! All the number fonts are bolder than gen.

Gen on top

2af3b0042e2cf1aa34b7a223fd555e18.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
The handslume should be pre-v for the q series and the corners of the cg are not as straight/square as the noob base pams the rest looks very good imo

Exactly, the case shape is too round, very noticeable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
So I’m not trying to be a dick but it sounds like you are really insecure about wearing a rep watch. If an innocent comment by someone who has zero knowledge of watches caused you to think this way what’s going to happen when a paneristi asks you about your Pam?

A paneristi or even a regular above average Pam loving guy would KNOW this is a rep just by looking at the case rounded edges and the bold number cutouts / weird non smooth curved open 9 too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

WatchestoPlay

Timelord
12/8/16
1,807
86
48
The case shape is too round ! Compare with a gen 000 and you will see. Also the open 6 and 9 are not as smoothly curved as the gen, sausage dials are very hard to replicate vs for example the very similar sandwiched dial 112! With that being said this is not a "fantastic rep" as many gen Panerai fans will quickly be able to spot these known rep flaws! I'd get a 112 instead , just my 2c.

The 3 is very good, the 6 is so so, the 9 is laughable ! All the number fonts are bolder than gen.

Gen on top

2af3b0042e2cf1aa34b7a223fd555e18.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Laughable? What in the world are you talking about... here is your pic zoomed even ridiculously further in. You say the rep isn’t as smoothly curved as the gen? In what way? If anything the gen 9 looks worse in these pics.
But again... this is zoomed into 100x’s bigger than you would ever see it in real life, unless you carry a loupe around with you all the time.View attachment 107383
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
Laughable? What in the world are you talking about... here is your pic zoomed even ridiculously further in. You say the rep isn’t as smoothly curved as the gen? In what way? If anything the gen 9 looks worse in these pics.
But again... this is zoomed into 100x’s bigger than you would ever see it in real life, unless you carry a loupe around with you all the time.View attachment 107383

Just do it yourself, go look online for Pam 000 dial pics and look at the 9 specially ... look at the "head" of the 9 and it's size, it's easier if you compare the black "head" against the surrounding lume that makes the number, look at the shape of the curves and how BOLDER they're, see the distance between the horizontal part of the 9 and the curve below ... if you're not able to see this, well... then you don't.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

WatchestoPlay

Timelord
12/8/16
1,807
86
48
Just do it yourself, go look online for Pam 000 dial pics and look at the 9 specially ... look at the "head" of the 9 and it's size, it's easier if you compare the black "head" against the surrounding lume that makes the number, look at the shape of the curves and how BOLDER they're, see the distance between the horizontal part of the 9 and the curve below ... if you're not able to see this, well... then you don't.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think you are missing my point... are there minute differences? Sure. But can you see this in the real world? Nope.
Also, have you seen every gen dial out there... there are variances in production. (I.e. gens have flaws)
IMO, you are making a mountain out of a mole hill. This is an UNDER $200 rep that is extremely good.
At the end of the day its just a $200 toy and not a $5000 gen.
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
I think you are missing my point... are there minute differences? Sure. But can you see this in the real world? Nope.
Also, have you seen every gen dial out there... there are variances in production. (I.e. gens have flaws)
IMO, you are making a mountain out of a mole hill. This is an UNDER $200 rep that is extremely good.
At the end of the day its just a $200 toy and not a $5000 gen.

Yes of course ! I understand the point, It's ridiculously cheap and that's amazingly good ! But I can assure you if I go right now into my paneristi account and upload the rep picture and ask for opinion , most will tell it's not real ! With all that I said I Wouldn't ever buy the gen [emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

granvino

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
3/4/11
981
166
43
Stop! Ristis in Dallas love my H Fac zero. They own gen PAM's and they haven't been able to tell. I own probably the most accurate 201A rep in the world and not one of them have ever questioned it. The very original zero! The H Fac case is not as accurate as this new one we are discussing. I just got mine and have been wearing it for 2 days to get a good feel so I can decide on the mods it needs. So far I can tell you the case in general is better than both H and Noob. Ditto for the dial and crystal. I'm hopping to get a nice relume so it can stand up in the dark. I've been uploading pics from P.com and one obvious thing is this: depending on the series the dials are different. Somehow after the M series the numerals seem thinner. As far as the edges on the case construction the X Fac is better than my H fac. The midcase curvature seems smoother and the edges are not as sharp. I'll come up with pics to show this once I have time....
 

groot

Known Member
11/6/17
124
9
0
Stop! Ristis in Dallas love my H Fac zero. They own gen PAM's and they haven't been able to tell. I own probably the most accurate 201A rep in the world and not one of them have ever questioned it. The very original zero! The H Fac case is not as accurate as this new one we are discussing. I just got mine and have been wearing it for 2 days to get a good feel so I can decide on the mods it needs. So far I can tell you the case in general is better than both H and Noob. Ditto for the dial and crystal. I'm hopping to get a nice relume so it can stand up in the dark. I've been uploading pics from P.com and one obvious thing is this: depending on the series the dials are different. Somehow after the M series the numerals seem thinner. As far as the edges on the case construction the X Fac is better than my H fac. The midcase curvature seems smoother and the edges are not as sharp. I'll come up with pics to show this once I have time....

Please do. Would really like to see your comparo on this one.
 

PAM1983

I'm Pretty Popular
6/4/15
1,174
9
0
Bezel doesn’t have the S mirror reflection the gen has. A major polish is needed. The numerals are a bit too fat indeed. But this is the best version to date. I sold my Gen 000 over a year ago or else I would’ve done a side by side comparison. Should get mine shortly.
 

jonathanw

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
6/9/15
1,182
59
48
I was just looking at the Pam 104 rep by Noob, now THAT is a super rep! The numbers are also applied on cutout recesses like a sausage but they're just PERFECT, not fat, same exact curves and proportions etc.

To be fair the 6 is closed (although there are series with an open 6) and it doesn't have a 9 because of the small seconds at 9 sub dial, so much easier to reproduce than the open ones on the 000! the open 6 and 9 , specially the open 9 are the usual tells on sausage dial rep pams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

granvino

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
3/4/11
981
166
43
Please consider that the following gen pics were taken by different people using different camera/settings with different light conditions at different times. From them I want to bring two obvious details to your attention: fat vs slim numerals and soft lines on the case edges. This 3 pics are are from P.com
M series with 'fat' numerals

P series case 'soft' lines

Q series with 'thin' numerals

The X Fac zero case and dial, judging from pics posted here by some members has more in common with the post M series gen case and dial. This weekend I'll take side by side pics of the H and X fac together. In the meantime, let's hear what you think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAM1983

groot

Known Member
11/6/17
124
9
0
Thanks @granvino

I am one of those that couldn't see the difference in the fat/thin numerals. Even side-by-side.

But I do see that the XF has modern hands and the reflections on its bezel are straight and not S.