Pam 569 Q V6F and ST25 mov?

[chris3007]

In on this one, promissed myself I will never buy an A7750 again after my ROO died....

Mate, you can not campers a A7750sec@12 movement from your AP with a A7750 movement from a PAM. That's two different things.
The AP movement has a chrono function and 5 gears more to bring the sec from 9 to 12. The A7750 in a PAM is a very solid base movement without all this extra loads

Sent from my iPad Air 2

 

[pure b]

I thought the A7750 is an unreliable movement by itself and with the secs@12 mod it's even more a POS. Am I wrong?

 

[chris3007]

I thought the A7750 is an unreliable movement by itself and with the secs@12 mod it's even more a POS. Am I wrong?

The base A7750 is a solid movement. Especially without the chrono. It's expensive, because it's build for a chrono but it's not a bad movement at all.


Sent from my iPad Air 2

 

[NickOT]

jeez I literally just placed an order today with Angus and sent payment......
I guess he will drop the price for this too.... do you think he would be willing to refund the difference?

I thought the A7750 is an unreliable movement by itself and with the secs@12 mod it's even more a POS. Am I wrong?

I'm pretty sure the A7750 was pretty reliable, the mod for seconds @12 was the issue (poorly made, dirty, early version was not jeweled etc).
I have read some say that the 7750 was not reliable due to the chrono function, and actually ok if you didn't use that, so this watch without the chrono should be even simpler and technically even more reliable.

 

[spursian]

jeez I literally just placed an order today with Angus and sent payment......
I guess he will drop the price for this too.... do you think he would be willing to refund the difference?



I'm pretty sure the A7750 was pretty reliable, the mod for seconds @12 was the issue (poorly made, dirty, early version was not jeweled etc).
I have read some say that the 7750 was not reliable due to the chrono function, and actually ok if you didn't use that, so this watch without the chrono should be even simpler and technically even more reliable.

Check with him. Sora refunded me some.

 

[pure b]

Allright, thanks guys

 

[peterpl]

7750 with sec@9 is a workhorse movement. 100000% reliable.

when the seconds are moved to 12 or 6 that when it becomes shithouse

 

[NickOT]

Angus just posted up a new 569 video....
and it is not the same video as of the V6F/KW 569..

[video]http://www.replicawatchvideo.com/watch.php?vid=fb96a4009[/video]

 

[ztealth]

7750 with sec@9 is a workhorse movement. 100000% reliable.

when the seconds are moved to 12 or 6 that when it becomes shithouse

what if the seconds is at 3?

 

[NickOT]

what if the seconds is at 3?

the 569 movement is rotated 180 degress, the crown is on the left so the seconds @3. this is a stock unmodified 7750

 

[PeterRei]

Meh, they put the KW A7750 on sale... I want a Seagull :drool:

 

[Sora]

seagull version out now

 

[pure b]

Nice!

 

[PeterRei]

seagull version out now

That's NICE!

 

[spursian]

seagull version out now

Darn, how much is that?

 

[AP_VC]

Darn, how much is that?

$268!!

 

[spursian]

Ah well, and I just paid for the 7750....

 

[nicktan182]

Ah well, and I just paid for the 7750....

same here mate. and that was BEFORE the price drop on the 7750. and then now the seagull zzzz

 

[Bozz]

$268!!

where????? I want one!!!!

 

[chris3007]

Ask ken, I think he can help you.


Sent from my iPhone 6