PAM 382 Bronzo - QC Pics allowed Thread

[ALE7575]

Don't see anything in ALE's guide on the SF 382. Any evaluations on that model?

No needed comments in PAM GUIDE
This is a rep to be forgotten. many obvious flaws
ALE

 

[eric72]

Patina free again.

Gesendet von meinem HUAWEI MT7-L09 mit Tapatalk

 

[Flight2016]

How did you clean it?

Sent from the RWI mobile app

 

[eric72]

Filled a box with pure lemon juice.

Gesendet von meinem HUAWEI MT7-L09 mit Tapatalk

 

[Br10_asp]

Hi buddies I need some help cause I am in my third round with the bronzo. I have placed some days ago my order with a TD for one bronzo from KW fitted with a Seagull inside.

I post you three pics of the three watches (and let you guess I discarded two first):

Pics:

First:

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


SECOND UNIT (DISCARDED TOO):

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


AND THE THIRD ONE - CURRENTLY THINKING ABOUT IT:

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


What do you think about the dial position in the third one? Is it crocked or it is only me... I am getting crazy!

Please I really would thank expert eyes!

 

[PAM1983]

Hi buddies I need some help cause I am in my third round with the bronzo. I have placed some days ago my order with a TD for one bronzo from KW fitted with a Seagull inside.

I post you three pics of the three watches (and let you guess I discarded two first):

Pics:

First:

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


SECOND UNIT (DISCARDED TOO):

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


AND THE THIRD ONE - CURRENTLY THINKING ABOUT IT:

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]


What do you think about the dial position in the third one? Is it crocked or it is only me... I am getting crazy!

Please I really would thank expert eyes!

Third one looks great to me and even the crown looks correct or close to it. all that patina will wash off with ketchup and look new.

 

[Br10_asp]

Third one looks great to me and even the crown looks correct or close to it. all that patina will wash off with ketchup and look new.

Yeah crown seems to be correct, what is worrying me is the position of the bezel and the dial. Looking and 9 oclock and bezel marker and looking hour markers looks like if it was not correctly aligned with the case or the bezel. Maybe is only matter of photo perspective / angle. I have already asked for one direct and straight photo with the watch over a firm surface. I hope that will clarify the dial position.

 

[elusive1]

What was wrong with first one? Looked like the correct crown. Second one looked like thin crown.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

[sur101]

Can't see the photos. Do they have correct crowns now ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Thrasher]

Only problem I see is thin crown in 2 but then its been years since I got mine so all the details I have forgotten

 

[voxx]

I liked the first one and the third one ...aw ...I like 'em all really !

 

[PAM1983]

Yeah crown seems to be correct, what is worrying me is the position of the bezel and the dial. Looking and 9 oclock and bezel marker and looking hour markers looks like if it was not correctly aligned with the case or the bezel. Maybe is only matter of photo perspective / angle. I have already asked for one direct and straight photo with the watch over a firm surface. I hope that will clarify the dial position.

It looks good to me. the angle of the photo is why it looks off a bit. Trust me it is a great piece. Glad they fixed the Crown and crown guard issues. I would snatch this up asap.

 

[Br10_asp]

I liked the first one and the third one ...aw ...I like 'em all really !

The first one was perfect in the front but it had three scratches in the casebsck. It was a pity I really liked the first one.

 

[Br10_asp]

It looks good to me. the angle of the photo is why it looks off a bit. Trust me it is a great piece. Glad they fixed the Crown and crown guard issues. I would snatch this up asap.

They have not fixed the crown issue as you can see in the second one... A skinny crown and tilted 12 oclock markers.

 

[Br10_asp]

It looks good to me. the angle of the photo is why it looks off a bit. Trust me it is a great piece. Glad they fixed the Crown and crown guard issues. I would snatch this up asap.

And sorry bro! Many thanks for your opinion indeed highly valued

 

[Br10_asp]

What was wrong with first one? Looked like the correct crown. Second one looked like thin crown.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

the first one was perfect in the front, really really nice but the caseback had some scratches if you look closely

 

[Enfield]

Looks like it is from Toro? I ordered a few watches some weeks ago and asked about fat crown and Got word back that they still only produce the skinny one.... it also looks skinny to me.
Chr

 

[pcardoza]

First and third pieces look fine. To reject those is being overly critical IMHO. #2 does have the skinny crown, which would irk me.

 

[Br10_asp]

Looks like it is from Toro? I ordered a few watches some weeks ago and asked about fat crown and Got word back that they still only produce the skinny one.... it also looks skinny to me.
Chr

As you can see the three watches have different crowns. The first maybe was the best, but it had at least three scratches in the caseback.

 

[Br10_asp]

First and third pieces look fine. To reject those is being overly critical IMHO. #2 does have the skinny crown, which would irk me.

Don't agree, look closely to the picture of its caseback. I asked to check those marks and TD automatically told me he send it back to fact.