Yup, if it's a softer 20mm leather strap, or a nato, it goes on just fine.
Thank you
@DocHolliday for the confirmation!
Well, I've been thoroughly bitten by the moon bug. Never understood what the hoopla is all about
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
till now.
Since
@Nivka excellent review (which I read before but only now partially comprehend), I decided to postpone ordering the Pam 676.
Personally, I like the look of the hands, lug shape and crown guards of the 3572 better than those of the 2998.
However, what spoils the 3572 for me is its rehaut that comes on the currently available reps.
It makes the watch look less a moonwatch and more like a race car watch IMHO (imitating the shape of a car wheel rather then the curve of the moon)
View attachment 87049 View attachment 87050
It is so noticeable to me that I imagine even a change if crystal wouldn't help.
However, on the 2998 the rehaut appears much better.
View attachment 87051
View attachment 87052
The dial seems to sit so much closer to the crystal here. Is that the effect of the gen crystal or is the rehaut indeed thinner on the 2998?
(
@Nivka mentioned: "... the gen crystal has a black ring at its base, so the rehaut looks smaller and more gen-like.")
@Nivka and
@DocHolliday could I please ask you to be so kind and confirm the height of the rehaut?