Ah that sucks! The one thing I really like about this black lacquer Aqua Terra was the president bracelet, to differentiate it from my other ATsAm i being quick to judge, or did they ignored the president bracelet entirely?
VSF is so lazy when it doesn't have direct competition lolNot the first time, VSF released an Omega rep with the wrong bracelet
Why spend more money tooling for something that 99% of buyers won't give a shit about.Not the first time, VSF released an Omega rep with the wrong bracelet
I am still not entirely sure why the 41mm is so much more popular than 38mm. I had a 41mm AT and its far too chunky (thickness), rep or gen. I get they invested shitton in 8900s, but they seriously need to start getting these models thinner, hell, all of seamaster range needs to get 1-2mm cut off.. Like, I love the PO, but this shit is unwearable, except 1948 LMPO, which is right on the maxiumum. My humble opinion, but then again, this is my personal tasteLove the black dial but 41mm is still too big for me
I'd hope the stickers are messing with my brain, but people say this confirming both of us:For me, the bracelet looks different then the older ones
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1idCrYZEJB/?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0
Right on. For your info, 38 also solves the thickness problem, 1.1 mm thinner than 41I am still not entirely sure why the 41mm is so much more popular than 38mm. I had a 41mm AT and its far too chunky (thickness), rep or gen. I get they invested shitton in 8900s, but they seriously need to start getting these models thinner, hell, all of seamaster range needs to get 1-2mm cut off.. Like, I love the PO, but this shit is unwearable, except 1948 LMPO, which is right on the maxiumum. My humble opinion, but then again, this is my personal taste
100% agreeI am still not entirely sure why the 41mm is so much more popular than 38mm. I had a 41mm AT and its far too chunky (thickness), rep or gen. I get they invested shitton in 8900s, but they seriously need to start getting these models thinner, hell, all of seamaster range needs to get 1-2mm cut off.. Like, I love the PO, but this shit is unwearable, except 1948 LMPO, which is right on the maxiumum. My humble opinion, but then again, this is my personal taste
Right on. For your info, 38 also solves the thickness problem, 1.1 mm thinner than 41
Most of those cases the watches own the wrist, not the wrist owns the watch. Exact opposite of the main idea of carrying a jewel. It's a twisted world.That's exactly what I don't get with VSF.. Just produce the 38s already. It seems symptomatic with the whole rep industry (outside niche communities like RWI) - if it's a fake, it also must be inherintly loud and obnoxious I just hope that's not the vast majority of the rep market, people who flex instead of enjoy, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense..
(Omega still needs to fix their shit regardless)
Yep AFAIK the latest VSF ATs match the Gen 41mm with date window at 6 and A8900. These have the horizontal ‘teak deck’ pattern (wooden floor).Sorry guys, I am not an Omega-head and I am a little bit lost.
VSF has a 40mm AT with A8900 (currently on a very good price also) that looks awfully close to those 38/41 models, with date window @6.
Is that the old model that was replaced in 2024 by the model discussed in this thread?
VSF also has a 41mm AT with A8500 (date window @3): also for this model I cannot find an equivalent on the Omega website: it is another discontinued model replaced by the new 34/38/41 line?
Thank you for any clarification!
Yep AFAIK the latest VSF ATs match the Gen 41mm with date window at 6 and A8900. These have the horizontal ‘teak deck’ pattern (wooden floor).