So super rep Status maybe ?
Are the 12 markers straight now? Will never be a super rep when the 12 was all crooked and fucked up in all the past versions
So super rep Status maybe ?
Are the 12 markers straight now? Will never be a super rep when the 12 was all crooked and fucked up in all the past versions
The 12 markers look as if the people making the dial are just not used to seeing Arabic 12s. The 1 is slightly higher than the “2” and the “2” isn’t perfectly parallel with the “1”.
I also can’t believe what a deep hole that the date wheel sits in. I get these are macro shots.
Still I have not bought a rep in ages, because of the amazing amount of micro brand watches, especially divers that do look really good and they don’t have these flaws.
I really want one of these, but the date wheel depth and 12 markers are killing me.
Oh wow
Looks amazing! Andrew said this is not a Noob. Is this the same release?
http://www.trustytime.club/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=35_114&products_id=18824
if you really want an LMPO rep, then this is the best time to get it. This rep has never been better, don't let the 12 or anything you wish were made better stop you from getting it. This watch is a real stunner
The "12" marker being crooked is just a QC issue if they applied the numbers carefully we wouldnt have any of these flaws. Its amazing though that all these iterations of this model they cant get basic things like alignment correct. Amazing.
you're right, it does'nt add up. I would say they could make everything correct but they wont, it's a part of the game. They do it intentionally so they can keep their businesses on. It will be stupid for them to give us a perfect replica.
Looks amazing! Andrew said this is not a Noob. Is this the same release?
http://www.trustytime.club/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=35_114&products_id=18824
I don’t think they do it on purpose at all
Looks amazing! Andrew said this is not a Noob. Is this the same release?
http://www.trustytime.club/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=35_114&products_id=18824
There is a big possibility maron. The v1 v2 etc almost never comes with only improvments, but with drawbacks too. You know it better than me. It is just a theory of course, but what ever this might be the outcome from it still gonna be the same for us.
Such a huge step forward with the dial, I couldn't care about the flaws with DW and the rest.
Such a huge step forward with the dial, I couldn't care about the flaws with DW and the rest.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
First post here...
I’ve read as much as I could find about the Noob LMPO from V1 through this newest V6 release and haven’t seen this “flaw” pointed out. If I’ve missed it being discussed, I apologize.
But...I can’t help but notice it every time I look at that beautiful face. Some versions have the gen correct truncated hash mark on each side of the 6 marker and some have 2 truncated hashes on each side. The photos below both purport to be Noob with the left one posted as a V5 and the right one posted as a V6. As you can see the V5 has the same single short hash as the genuine but the V6 has incorrect shorter hashes on the first two markings each side of the 6. Has this been discussed and how much does it bother those who wear the watch? I have an order in now with Intime for what they’re listing as the V6 version and am essentially hoping that it comes with the correct hashes.
https://postimg.cc/ZBR9RfPy
Sent from the RWI App
Such a huge step forward with the dial, I couldn't care about the flaws with DW and the rest.