At some period steel and ceramic black indeed had the same dials in GEN world
That is just not correct. 116500 and 116520 never shared the same black dial. The 5 lines of tekst has different fonts and placement
At some period steel and ceramic black indeed had the same dials in GEN world
That is just not correct. 116500 and 116520 never shared the same black dial. The 5 lines of tekst has different fonts and placement
That is just not correct. 116500 and 116520 never shared the same black dial. The 5 lines of tekst has different fonts and placement
I would agree with this, but I have read that it was not uncommon for Gen 116520 owners to switch the Steel Bezel to a newer 116500 Ceramic Bezel for a newer, updated looking Daytona.
If someone have expirience, i wonder is it true that noob use 100% same subdials on both 116500 and 116520 black dials? Really im about to pull the thrigger for v3 this time and i want to wear it out of box like as it is and i dont want to some people say me like "hey that is the dial of old daytona 116520" lol
Have somebody compared this two dials from noob?
My black dial Noob V3 arrived today from PT. Here it is next to my Noob V2.2 in white. What a huge improvement on the SELs on this. Yeah the subdials are quite a bit shiny, but I kinda like it that way.
M Scott are the gen 116520 black dial and noob 116500 black dial have same subdials? Not thickness but color shine..or noob 116500 dial have more matt than the gen 116520? If you understand me
The Gen 116520 Black Dials had Sub-dials that were almost as shinny as the Case and the Hands. This lack of contrast between the Hands and Sub-dials made the watch more difficult to read at a glance. So when the Black Dial 116500 was designed, Rolex made the Sub-dials thinner and gave them more of a matte silver finish.
- The Noob V1 and V2 Black Dials both had Sub-dials that were way too thick and too shinny.
- The V2.2 Black Dials had Sub-dials that were about the thickness of a Gen 116520 and just as shinny. Better, but still wrong.
- Some Noob V3s have the old thick Sub-dialed V1-V2 Black Dials. A step back and really wrong.
- The latest V3 (V3.2?) does finally have the correct Sub-dial thickness, but they are still much too shinny as described above.
A Genuine 116500 Panda, 116520 White Dial, and 116520 Black Dial have Sub-dials that are all the same thickness.
Only the 116500 Ceramic Bezel Black Dial has slightly thinner Sub-dials that these other three Gen Daytonas.
Noob's lastest V3 116500 Black Dial has Sub-dials that are shinny like a Gen 116520 Black Dial.
The Silver Sub-dials should have a Matte finish to be closer to a Gen 116500, but they don't. Noob continues to get this detail wrong.
Any latest Noob QC photos showing any improvement on either white or black dial regarding sub dial thickness?
+1 im also curious..funds are waiting for pulling the thrigger for one of this but idk should i do now or wait