Noob PAM243 - I found one really simple, easy and dissapointing tell...

[45acp]

Still, I am quite puzzled as to why Panerai would change grammatically correct "diver's professional" to "divers professional", which makes no sense in English?

I don't think "divers" is necessarily grammatically incorrect. It's just like "a watch for divers" rather than "a diver's watch."

 

[ALE7575]

OK fellows, false alarm then! I am glad we have sorted it out.

Still, I am quite puzzled as to why Panerai would change grammatically correct "diver's professional" to "divers professional", which makes no sense in English?

Anyways, case closed. Back to enjoying the watch. Phew...

Hi korneevy
I'm repeating my above thread
Although, this was finally a false alarm, this is the way to improve the replicas and we nned people like you seraching and announcing thise "flaws".
Thanks again and don't get discouraged for that

ALE

 

[ALE7575]

This is not a grammatical question
This is an accuracy matter
In case that Panerai engraved DIBER'S in its watches the replica had to have DIBER'S engraved.

ALE

 

[Americano]

: Picard:

 

[ALE7575]

At least that manufacturers can do is to send a well written cover to buyers PAM0243-V2 it was at the time an almost perfect reproduction ..

Another one ????

Read again the thread my friend !!

And COMPLETE please !!

ALE

 

[Americano]

I do not know, but the PAM 0243 K has the same error. In other words there is no such error. At least in the series "K, L and M".

 

[45acp]

Jesus god does no one read threads before posting anymore

 

[Fiddo]

Jesus god does no one read threads before posting anymore

Nah...they just look at the pictures.

 

[Leewei]

www.network54.com/Forum/353390/message/1325357390/FS-+PAM+243K+(dkwong87)
Pam K series without Diver's . Dont think its a rep.

 

[45acp]

www.network54.com/Forum/353390/message/1325357390/FS-+PAM+243K+(dkwong87)
Pam K series without Diver's . Dont think its a rep.

Now you're just trolling.

 

[trailboss99]

Still, I am quite puzzled as to why Panerai would change grammatically correct "diver's professional" to "divers professional", which makes no sense in English?

Makes perfect sense in English as out lined below. The term is used by most if not all dive watch manufactures inc Seiko, Citizen, Squale, Omega, etc etc.

I don't think "divers" is necessarily grammatically incorrect. It's just like "a watch for divers" rather than "a diver's watch."

Quite.

 

[azdakota]

oopps

Not true there is a gen for sale from april 15 from reputable seller and the k series does not have the comma in the divers word.:goat: