-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
No more due to raids?
- Thread starter Dc703
- Start date
Pene75
Getting To Know The Place
- 11/10/21
- 73
- 25
- 8
Pene75
Getting To Know The Place
- 11/10/21
- 73
- 25
- 8
- 23/11/21
- 23
- 7
- 3
This PAM1117 is really a beautiful watch. This one looks very nice but can't comment on the QC cause I don't know what a VSF looks like, but I see the lume on the CG is continuous and does not have a "break" in the middle like gen. Curious what the side of the CG looks like as well. Will wait for someone with knowledge to comment.
I don’t see anything that wasn’t seen before on your PAM1117, leo6929 !
Offset DW a bit, but it used to be difficult to get one without blending from VSF, especially in blue. Considering how PANERAI centers their GENs at P.9010, I wouldn't think about that. Congratulations on your purchase!
Your PAM1441 is also no different from what was offered before, and I do not see any significant non-typical shortcomings, Pene75 .
Just do not forget about the "cabeback" which is on all vsf PAM1441 and be happy that the PAM441 VSF does not have this kind of errors, but it has a transparent caseback showing a clone.
This model is not often seen in discussions, but I am sure that jonnybaws , having one such, can tell at first hand whether there is any specificity in your copy.
Offset DW a bit, but it used to be difficult to get one without blending from VSF, especially in blue. Considering how PANERAI centers their GENs at P.9010, I wouldn't think about that. Congratulations on your purchase!
Your PAM1441 is also no different from what was offered before, and I do not see any significant non-typical shortcomings, Pene75 .
Just do not forget about the "cabeback" which is on all vsf PAM1441 and be happy that the PAM441 VSF does not have this kind of errors, but it has a transparent caseback showing a clone.
This model is not often seen in discussions, but I am sure that jonnybaws , having one such, can tell at first hand whether there is any specificity in your copy.
In order for you to have knowledge on this matter, I recommend reading the threads of this model:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/forum/panerai/9424774-vsf-pam1117
https://forum.replica-watch.info/forum/panerai/8832149-pam-1117-1118-and-1119-released
And since we’ll talk about last year’s models here again, I’ll give a link to my last post (although I don’t like to refer to myself, especially since a lot of information has appeared since that time):
https://forum.replica-watch.info/forum/panerai/9692510-something-about-all-reps-panerai-2020
However, since this thread has acquired a new goal, I see the point in giving it for verification, so as not to decide what are differences from gen, but what are differences from past parties, before making a purchase decision.
I no longer have this model, sold it a while back, I would have kept it if I was patient and fixed the AR but I wasn't...
I like the watch, pretty solid, albeit with its spelling flaws on the caseback.
The pics look like its from the same batch run of watches that I got.. so congrats on the pickup.. the stock rep strap is decent too..
Arthur Dore
Getting To Know The Place
same answer as here
forum.replica-watch.info
No.
Friends, I am about to give the green light for a pam382, but I have no experience with quality control, would you be kind to take a look and tell me if it is a good representative ? I would appreciate it very much Mod edit: Nope. It is your watch, and posting unapproved QC pics isn't allowed...
forum.replica-watch.info
Last edited by a moderator:
What is this for? Three times you are publishing these QC. Two times you were edited and instructed to the rules. What exactly you don't understand?