Standard size is
22/18 135/55 for the deployment
But for example, I have a 7.5in wrist, so I order mine 140/60
![]()
thanks for the quick reply
sent from BOOOOOOOOOM
Standard size is
22/18 135/55 for the deployment
But for example, I have a 7.5in wrist, so I order mine 140/60
![]()
5007-02 is out:
![]()
Tuned a bit
![]()
Pretty good compared to gen...
![]()
So, Today I pulled the plug on this one.
I hope it is as good as it looks. I have not seen anyone here that has ordered it. If someone have, would you please care to comment on how good it is and perhaps post a picture?
Pulled the plug on this one today as wellit's such a handsome watch. Can't wait
Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk
Would you care to elaborate on that?Certainly one of the best looking rep versions but way off the mark in terms of accuracy. Looking forward to seeing some pictures.
Would you care to elaborate on that?
I would definitely not like the idea of having bought something that is not looking proper.
Skickat från min SM-G928F via Tapatalk
I see.The rep Portuguese 7 day is more akin to a 5001 than a 5007 in terms of dial printing, position of strap and movement, especially the rotor. IWC never made a 5001 in rose gold and ardoise apart from a "Year of the Dragon" limited edition, which had some differences from a regular 5001, the obvious one being the medallion in the rotor.
Most TD's are calling there version a 5007-02. The 5007 in rose gold also has a different clasp design compared to the 5001. I agree the rep is a cool looking watch, but a knowledgeable IWC owner would certainly know it is a fake. Then again, how many IWC owners do you associate with? This is a hobby after all and if we were looking for perfection we should all save enough money and buy a gen.
All. I would live some help in the matter above.
As it seems I have bought a watch that is a really bad rep.
According to the above statement anyone who knows anything about IWC will in a blink know it is a fake.
Please let me know all you can about this so I can make up my mind if I will tell Ryan it is a no go.
Skickat från min SM-G928F via Tapatalk
more closeup hallmark
![]()
![]()
I have but rejected the first piece. Waiting for my second QC. It's a nice color combination. Already have the stainless steel with white dial and gold numbers and it's a beautiful watch. The 5007-02 might not be accurate but it doesn't bother me! Just don't take it off for others to look closely!What you are saying might explain why noone have placed an order before
Skickat från min SM-G928F via Tapatalk
Would you care to post the pictures for us to look at?I have but rejected the first piece. Waiting for my second QC. It's a nice color combination. Already have the stainless steel with white dial and gold numbers and it's a beautiful watch. The 5007-02 might not be accurate but it doesn't bother me! Just don't take it off for others to look closely!
So does the gen carry four hallmarks in total? The rep only has two.
Would you care to post the pictures for us to look at?
I am not bothered by the flaws that made you reject the watch. I just want to see the colours and combo.
Skickat från min SM-G928F via Tapatalk