Oh god Overthetop your whole post is :facepalm:
So I'll answer some of the points for one last time, but after that, stop posting stuff like that, I'm not asking, if you wish to answer me and continue this debate, I have a PM box and you are welcome to you use as much as you want.
Look, is not me the one who started badly, it's you that's keeping on the wrong way.
This joke you made doesn't make sense ... I realized that my tones could be misunderstood because they could be interpreted either as altered tones or not - which is why I wanted to clarify that they were not altered - instead of your tones that they were evidently altered given the firmness with which you wrote "First of all, your lower your virtual tone with me." So that's why I was talking about yours as if I had known how they were.
And to finish with the bad joke you made, this time it's me that invite you (with love - just to clarify my intention) to review your impolite and presumptuous ways because:
1. From me it does not seem you did not had respect
2. You don't know who is on the other side so your approach - especially cause you are part of the staff- should be polite not inappropriate and disrespectful
I'll ignore this non sense because you obviously didn't get it the first time, no point of trying to explain it to you again and this is at best tiresome for other people to read has it has nothing to do with the subject.
I think it's obvious that I specified that what I write is based on facts not only on ideas or opinions. If I’ve said that I had in hand PPF-PF-MKF and gen and i compared it, this is not opinion is a fact. If the PPF is near to the gen overall is a fact not an opinion.
You are not familiar with the concept of a "fact" are you ? So because you, allegedly (I don't believe you one bit but that's not the point), had all of those in hand and a gen, and compared it, it's a fact ?
That's exactly an opinion, you had them, and YOU thought something of them, that doesn't make it a fact. Hence :
you wrote "just opinions stated as facts"
By the way you can't base the reliability of a user on how many threads or reviews this has done or at least on its activity on the forum.
Of course it is, how the heck would you judge the credibility of someone talking, are we supposed to blindly believe everyone that post here ? I didn't post any proof of my gen comparison, hence why I took care to never state anything as a fact, but always as my personal opinion on the subject with the knowledge I shared and showed. I agreed with opposing opinion than mine and I'm not blindly rooting for any side, and I'm especially not going around saying "trust me" to anyone, unlike you do, that's what "impose an opinion" is.
It is here that I think you are wrong: insisting that the weight of the defects of the 3 models is something to be evaluated subjectively is not correct because in the end we are here to find the most similar replica and not to determine who has more taste on the shades of blue. In fact, although the blue and the gray of the PPF are not yet identical to the gen, they are however those that resemble it more: this factor combined with a good thickness and a good bracelet lead to the conclusion that, even if you consider it subjective but unfortunately it isn't, the PPF is the most suitable choice for those who want a replica very close to gen
Whatever this was supposed to mean, I think I get that you do not the definition of most of the words you use, everything you said is highly subjective, as well as my review and other reviews. You have to ponder all the defects, not just the one YOU consider not worth being put in the balance. People can't get behind the bezel of the PPF or the crown, I think it's a non-issue, people can't get behind the different date window position of the MK non-issue as well. But it's not because I think these are non-issues that I ignore them. I won't be commenting everywhere saying that they are wrong of thinking that, I would be merely advising that this is an issue that they won't really see once wearing it but if it bothers them, they should obviously not buy it.
So you are not the one who decides when something is subjective or not, just because it serves your purpose.
I'm trying to say is that the PPF - among the 3 - is the one with minor defects which - compared to those that PF and MKF has - point out less than this is a replica
And I don't think the same, so what do we do now ? There can be obviously one truth only ? See where I'm going with this whole subjective thing ?
9mm for a 5711 are many and definitely make the difference!
That's just a pure idiotic statement, not even worth going into it.
MKF : starting from the thickness it should be out of the game even if it has a quite good dial and passable flexibility of the bracelet. Good Crown - Good Bezel
:facepalm:
PF : starting from the dial it should be of the game even if it is thinner than the MKF. Good crown. Good Bezel
Showing that you retained only what you wanted from your reading as the MK as always been either thinner or of the same thickness as the PF excluding variability in batches, and this has been said right from the start
PPF : good thickness(nearest to the gen), good dial (nearest to the gen), good bracelet (nearest to the gen) - “Bad” crown - “Bad” Bezel
Opinion, opinion, opinion, opinion, opinion
So tell me what you would choose (to take something near to the gen) or convince me to take the others.
I wouldn't exchange my MK for any of the current model, not even with money on the table, because this is the model I like. And I would certainly not convince anyone of anything, as I would just lay out the differences and point them each little flaw of all of them and let them decide themselves.
I'm sorry that you see the fact that the PPF could be the best as a subjective thing because from what you say you also have experience with the gen and therefore you should be able to see, understand and share what I am saying.
Apply that to you too, as you should now have, the exact definition of what something subjective is, it's about time.
Now if you wish to answer this post, do so by PM, again, not asking it.
Sorry for the headache everyone else, this stupid debate is coming over and over, and I partially fuelled it. Ignore those long posts, they are not worth it (both mine and his)
