OverTheTop moved your response here, no need to continue it over the wristshot thread.
My virtual tone are lower than yours, trust me! You should know that tones in a forum could be easly misunderstood and mine are quiet
So you are saying that tone can be misinterpreted but yet your talking about mine like you know how it is ... well, doesn't start well for the credibility of your next arguments... :silly:
I read everyday only Patek and AP section and my attention goes only to 5711, 5167, 15400, 15450, 15202, 67650 and 15703. Sometimes I read about Daytona too but this is not important. You're right I never posted my comparisons or my studies about these reps, just some considerations in some threads..but if I talk about something is not just because "I heard about it" but because I had those in my hand and compared to a gen.
Unfortunately until now, talking about PPF, i had in hand only the white one so, dial color apart, I can talk about it just considering it overall. For the blue dial, just seeing those 2 photos*, you can undestrand that PPF blue dial is better than PF.
So like I said, nothing added to the debate, nothing reliable about your infos, just opinions stated as facts.
PPF blue dial is different, but is it better ? It's in the eye of the person wearing it
Why I state that PPF is better? Because MKF could have a nice dial but it has wrong date, it is too thick and the bracelet flexibility is not the best;
Remember and read again, I've never said that any model was better than the other, there's a compromise to make on every model at the moment, so you can't have a definitive answer on that, as people will find flaws and things they dislike in every model.
MKF is not thick at all, at least on the V5, it's exactly 9mm and bracelet is perfectly fine even for small wrists, but there's always bad batches and problems on reps, just look at the bracelets issue of the PPF
I could result repetitive and boring talking only about bracelet, thickness and dial but these are the elements that destinguish the watch.
Whatever that means, all of this have been discussed, well debated and currently we are finally reaching a consensus where we agree that all versions have their advantages and disadvantages and that it's not a bad thing as everyone can choose what he likes.
So posting to say that this or this model is better than the other is just plain wrong.
your MKF has be lucky with the bracelet or the one that I had in my hand was wrong, but comparing MKF/PF/PPF to the gen to me the best one result the PPF.
First sane thing you said : variability and personal opinion can produce different results, hence why I totally agree that mine can be a lucky draw (even though it's been backed up by numerous other buyers) and you could have been unlucky.
I still cannot undertand what are the false information
Well just here for example :
it's objective : ppf is near to the gen and overall better than PF and MKF
It's not objective at all, it's highly subjective and frankly it's just confusing people to see this old debate starting again