It is a A7750 from Noob! The did an excellent dial on that model!
what does it have to do with the question I quoted?
It is a A7750 from Noob! The did an excellent dial on that model!
Guys I am in China! This seller is telling me this watch is NOOB 116520 but for me it is a “cheap” with A7750 can you confirm?
https://ibb.co/YjMXggG
https://ibb.co/m9bYm4S
https://ibb.co/KjYPGtb
https://ibb.co/G3p1PVF
Sent from the RWI App
Guys I am in China! This seller is telling me this watch is NOOB 116520 but for me it is a “cheap” with A7750 can you confirm?
https://ibb.co/YjMXggG
https://ibb.co/m9bYm4S
https://ibb.co/KjYPGtb
https://ibb.co/G3p1PVF
Sent from the RWI App
I'm asking for the noob daytona 116520 black dial with superclone 4130 mvt. The subdials in the V1 are too fat. Does the dial on V2 looks better? Did somebody get QC Pics ?
and nobody answers this....
Thanks for this info. So I'm gonna get the V1 and install a gen dial and bezel
Noob seems to use the exact same dials for black 116500 and 116520. Which means yes, they probably will have a new black dial with thinner subdials for a “V2 116520 Black” but the ROLEX font and words underneath will be in the same format as the 116500 version ; more scrunched up and quite an easy tell even on the wrist, IMHO.
About September of 2018 the Noob Daytonas were changed from a 316L case to a 904L case.
At this same time the Dealers changed their listings for all Noob Daytonas from V1 to V2 and the price increased by $100.
The improvements to the dials and to the quality in February 2019 are not being called a new version by the Dealers, just an "Updated Dial."
.
The sherif “R” shape on the bezel is the one of the main flaws that can be recognized easily.
Is it an intended flaw by noob?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i dare you say it's visible with watch in hand
II don't know how many times I have to say this til people listen to me.
There are four gen dial variations for the 116500. Only two are really visible for people who don't eat modafinil all day and procrastinate when they have work and assignments to do
V1 - 2016 - Skinny O in ROLEX, skinny subdials. Serif in R
V2 - 2017 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinny subdials, no serif in R
V3 - 2018 - Fat O in ROLEX, fatter subdials, Serif in R
V4 - 2019 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinnier subdials than 2018 but fatter than 2017, no serif in R
Both ARF and Noob based their design on the 2018 version, so the slightly fatter subdials is a NON-ISSUE on the v2.
Where noob fucked up is they based their dial on the ROLEX catalogue NOT the actual watch itself. Therefore you see a disproportionate spacing between the O and R & L in ROLEX
Basically, they copied a book.
None of the dials are perfect. ARF put the numerals too high in the subdial but only marginally. It is a VERY good copy of 2018 116500LN, perfectly passable
When I first saw noob I thought OMG what the hell have they done. But actually it's not the worst attempt given they probably copied 2016 and the 2017/2018 catalogue.
Noob O is not as such wrong, it just looks weird and is fantasy because it takes elements of different variations.
I stand by the conclusion that the dial, for best effect, should be ARF.
Also, I won't repeat for white, but bear in mind 2018 was slightly less bright white and more creamy. Marginally. So no need for waxing treatments etc because ARF is copying the 2018 dial.
For 116500 bezel, just get hold of the ARF however you can. The noob is wrong. I held both and the gen in my hand. The ARF is a shade too glossy but the noob is very cheap looking, the engravings are too shallow, and the S in units is totally wrong.
NOW GIVE ME SOME REP POINTS MOFOS
II don't know how many times I have to say this til people listen to me.
There are four gen dial variations for the 116500. Only two are really visible for people who don't eat modafinil all day and procrastinate when they have work and assignments to do
V1 - 2016 - Skinny O in ROLEX, skinny subdials. Serif in R
V2 - 2017 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinny subdials, no serif in R
V3 - 2018 - Fat O in ROLEX, fatter subdials, Serif in R
V4 - 2019 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinnier subdials than 2018 but fatter than 2017, no serif in R
Both ARF and Noob based their design on the 2018 version, so the slightly fatter subdials is a NON-ISSUE on the v2.
Where noob fucked up is they based their dial on the ROLEX catalogue NOT the actual watch itself. Therefore you see a disproportionate spacing between the O and R & L in ROLEX
Basically, they copied a book.
None of the dials are perfect. ARF put the numerals too high in the subdial but only marginally. It is a VERY good copy of 2018 116500LN, perfectly passable
When I first saw noob I thought OMG what the hell have they done. But actually it's not the worst attempt given they probably copied 2016 and the 2017/2018 catalogue.
Noob O is not as such wrong, it just looks weird and is fantasy because it takes elements of different variations.
I stand by the conclusion that the dial, for best effect, should be ARF.
Also, I won't repeat for white, but bear in mind 2018 was slightly less bright white and more creamy. Marginally. So no need for waxing treatments etc because ARF is copying the 2018 dial.
For 116500 bezel, just get hold of the ARF however you can. The noob is wrong. I held both and the gen in my hand. The ARF is a shade too glossy but the noob is very cheap looking, the engravings are too shallow, and the S in units is totally wrong.
NOW GIVE ME SOME REP POINTS MOFOS
If you wanted the most accurate black dial, which would you get?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk