Is a picture of a user in another thread:
He photoshop both in same size. The Subdials looks better here.
II don't know how many times I have to say this til people listen to me.
There are four gen dial variations for the 116500. Only two are really visible for people who don't eat modafinil all day and procrastinate when they have work and assignments to do
V1 - 2016 - Skinny O in ROLEX, skinny subdials. Serif in R
V2 - 2017 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinny subdials, no serif in R
V3 - 2018 - Fat O in ROLEX, fatter subdials, Serif in R
V4 - 2019 - Fat O in ROLEX, skinnier subdials than 2018 but fatter than 2017, no serif in R
Both ARF and Noob based their design on the 2018 version, so the slightly fatter subdials is a NON-ISSUE on the v2.
Where noob fucked up is they based their dial on the ROLEX catalogue NOT the actual watch itself. Therefore you see a disproportionate spacing between the O and R & L in ROLEX
Basically, they copied a book.
None of the dials are perfect. ARF put the numerals too high in the subdial but only marginally. It is a VERY good copy of 2018 116500LN, perfectly passable
When I first saw noob I thought OMG what the hell have they done. But actually it's not the worst attempt given they probably copied 2016 and the 2017/2018 catalogue.
Noob O is not as such wrong, it just looks weird and is fantasy because it takes elements of different variations.
I stand by the conclusion that the dial, for best effect, should be ARF.
Also, I won't repeat for white, but bear in mind 2018 was slightly less bright white and more creamy. Marginally. So no need for waxing treatments etc because ARF is copying the 2018 dial.
For 116500 bezel, just get hold of the ARF however you can. The noob is wrong. I held both and the gen in my hand. The ARF is a shade too glossy but the noob is very cheap looking, the engravings are too shallow, and the S in units is totally wrong.
NOW GIVE ME SOME REP POINTS MOFOS