Quick Question, What is the stock strap length, My wrist is big but it fits me perfect and I want to pick up an orange and green strap but I'm at work and wore an Omega today so I cant measure. I don't like a lot of over hang.
Does anyone know if kw will release a v2?
KW PAM 382 with movement KP9000-V2 is ready
http://www.repgeek.com/showthread.php?t=238690
It seems that KW has not weakened the real balance cock (or maybe they have weakened it just a little) and we will not have problems about the working of this "new" KW movement
We would need to confirm it
ALE
Ale, what do you mean with "KW has not weakened the real balance cock" ? Is it you mean with this new release, the balance cock is more weak than before? Or is it the opposite?
My KW v1 has movement problems since I received it and I am curious does it have any relation with what you just said here?
In the versions V2 of non inverted decoration layout movements, makers have kept the real balance cock and added a false decoration bridge orientated in the same way as the original in order to get a non inverted decoration circular bridge and get correct orientation of the inscriptions
In order to "hide" the real balance cock ZFac has reduced it to a thin bar and I think we could get problems of working of the movement, because maker has reduced a lot the balance cock and this is the bridge supporting the Incabloc system of the Balance wheel.
It seems that KW has kept the real balance cock (or reduced it just a little) and the real balance cock remains actually hidden under the false escapement wheel. Due to KW has not reduced the balance cock (at least not strongly) we could expect a similar working of the movement.
In V1 versions there is no modification of balance cock and it is covered by the false decoration balance cock bridge. The issues in your movement should be for other reasons
ALE
I could not totally understand what you are saying, but I think what you are telling me is:
1. KW v1 and v2 will have similar working performance of the movement
2. ZF v1 and v2, both have 'thinner' balance cock, and may result in better performance of movement overall than KW's
3. By reducing / make the balance cock thinner, a maker can improve the performance of the movement
Please correct me and show me which of these statements is a mistake. Very grateful to have this kind of knowledge from you
Also, I have always wanted to ask,
When we get a DOA automatic movement (in this case I am referring specifically to a 7750), and when after being diassembled by a watch repairman, he saw nothing damaged/broken, is it ALWAYS be the case that the movement will always be able to be repaired? Or is there some cases where a "dead" / dying movement will not be able to be serviced and back to normal working again?