jaredjohnson
Active Member
- 26/2/17
- 255
- 5
- 0
But why the IWC 3777-01 ZF is in the consensual list if the v6f is better?
Not quite clear what you're asking but if it's why V6 over the ZF? From what I read the details are more accurate to the GM and the movement is more reliable Why is the ZF on the consequential list? I guess I don't know about that list but I guess it's still decent but the V6 is reporedtly better but consensus.
IWC 3777-01 ZF is considered to be a Super Rep: https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...sion/308081-consensual-list-super-reps-nwbigs
That is why I was surprised that in this thread V6F is considered to be better.
Well today is 9 days since I ordered from Lucy and paid. via PP. She said she was ordering it and in 1-2 days I would receive pictures during QC checking. I've emailed her twice now and no response.
Should I be concerned?
I have not used Lucy but from what I have heard they are not as quick as some others but the QC is very good. 1-2 days is a standard response...I've had QC pics as quick as a couple of hours, couple of days or a few weeks and even the dreaded watch is out of stock choose another!
I think the ZF version is closer to gen in terms of the dial color and overall replication but that can be subjective. The QC is hit or miss. I have the 3776-06 that I purchased the one year ago and its still running strong keeping accurate time but there is a minor dial flaw, and my crown stripped after 1 month. Its probably my favorite watch in my collection. My cousin also bought the VF version and his has no QC issues. That being said, its really hit or miss on the QC but the replication quality is prime. If you aren't watch savy, just stick with the V6f. I enjoyed repairing and regulating my VF myself, great learning experience.