In Depth Review - AP ROO Diver JF "v9.5"

[legend]

V9.5 vs genuine comparison http://m.v.qq.com/play/play.html?vi...from=copy&pgid=page_detail&mod_id=mod_toolbar


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No. That’s a comparison of something called the “FK” (or “FK+”) model on the left vs JF on the right. Visually, there is also no way either watch is gen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

No. That’s a comparison of something called the “FK” (or “FK+”) model on the left vs JF on the right. Visually, there is also no way either watch is gen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FK local TD name , video description JF vs Genuine.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[legend]

FK local TD name , video description JF vs Genuine.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Neither of the watches are genuine I assure you. Let me get a guy whose eyes are better than mine to have a look. But I doubt I’m wrong.
[mention]QueTip [/mention]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SuperLory]

LOL. GEN ON THE LEFT

 

[legend]

LOL. GEN ON THE LEFT

Then I like the new style mini date font. Looks like they are copying the canal st model one. Haha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

I assume you’re chinese and you understand chinese, but you do know that that guy in the video mentioned the one at the left is not genuine?


Sent from the RWI App

It’s genuine yes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Repworld]

Sorry double post , I shared same video, I thought it’s gen but look unnamed maker , in description it’s gen daily I see comparisons pics and videos some real some cheat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[legend]

Sorry double post , I shared same video, I thought it’s gen but look unnamed maker , in description it’s gen daily I see comparisons pics and videos some real some cheat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’ve already told you: both watches in the videos aren’t gen. Let’s not argue about this anymore. Both of them are reps, period.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SuperLory]

I’ve already told you: both watches in the videos aren’t gen. Let’s not argue about this anymore. Both of them are reps, period.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

the one the right we all can agree on because of the sticker LOL

 

[Erinoush]

I’ve already told you: both watches in the videos aren’t gen. Let’s not argue about this anymore. Both of them are reps, period.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

if it is not secret, could you tell s a bit more why it is that obvious that the left one is so fake to your sharp eye (date aside) ?

 

[jazzmazz]

Does the jf v9.5 exist with a white dial ? I see dealers have white dial roo divers, but they are all older versions (like v7 or so...)

 

[Kingquest_s]

if it is not secret, could you tell s a bit more why it is that obvious that the left one is so fake to your sharp eye (date aside) ?

The inner ring instant tell.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[QueTip]

if it is not secret, could you tell s a bit more why it is that obvious that the left one is so fake to your sharp eye (date aside) ?

Case geometry, date wheel, cyclops, dial print and overall finish, stack of the hands, diving scale, rubber compositions, want me to go on?

 

[Erinoush]

Case geometry, date wheel, cyclops, dial print and overall finish, stack of the hands, diving scale, rubber compositions, want me to go on?

do you see all these stuff from this low res shot or it is something you see if you have it in your hands ?
my question was about the specific low res photo and the fact legend was that sure....

 

[QueTip]

do you see all these stuff from this low res shot or it is something you see if you have it in your hands ?
my question was about the specific low res photo and the fact legend was that sure....

How else could I know. I didn’t take that video so I did not have that specific watch in hand. That’s what I can tell from that low res picture.

 

[Erinoush]

How else could I know. I didn’t take that video so I did not have that specific watch in hand. That’s what I can tell from that low res picture.

okee, thx for the info...sharp eye....

EDIT: oops ok, i got it, didn't see there was a video attached, i thought there was just the poor photo... then with the video it is more clear !

 

[QueTip]

okee, thx for the info...sharp eye....

EDIT: oops ok, i got it, didn't see there was a video attached, i thought there was just the poor photo... then with the video it is more clear !

I didn’t watch the video.

 

[legend]

if it is not secret, could you tell s a bit more why it is that obvious that the left one is so fake to your sharp eye (date aside) ?

There are a lot of things wrong just from that pic, and I think Quetip has said it all. He is above me in terms of knowledge and observation skills, so I have nothing more to add lol.
But the point of my post was so that the rest of the members not get misled into thinking how good the rep is vs the "gen", when it is a rep vs rep comparison, nothing more.

 

[SuperLory]

i dont want to sound superhuman but there is really no need to have "sharp eyes" to see the flaws in the left specimen. C'mon

 

[Erinoush]

i dont want to sound superhuman but there is really no need to have "sharp eyes" to see the flaws in the left specimen. C'mon

to see all what was mentioned by quetip i think you need a certain level of knowledge , if you notice all this just by the low res image without looking the video your eye is well trained ...