- 4/9/20
- 2,880
- 3,450
- 113
the think is with all reps they are not all the same maybe some vsf has better cases.... mine vsf had problem on the case was wrong .
Sure, I'd accept they may not all be the same.
the think is with all reps they are not all the same maybe some vsf has better cases.... mine vsf had problem on the case was wrong .
Like many others, I have followed ZF since it's over hyped and disappointing release. The CG's were too short which is why it was not popular. It also had unacceptable SEL gaps which were later fixed. The rest of the watch was similar quality to VSF and the Hulk dial was better.
If you see something different, perhaps you have an updated ZF. Can you post some pics please and I will give my opinion if your CG's are like gen or not.
Gen and VSF CG's and lugs are 1:1 as far as I am concerned. Actually, Gen and VSF 116 case is 1:1 as far as I'm concerned (rehaut angle aside)..
.
I still think the Vsf looks good in certain lighting . I think the dial print and text is also better than ZF, and let’s be honest most People aren’t going to be able to tell. No1 is gonna spot the cg, rehaut or dial printing when it’s on your wrist
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No question about it, VSF Hulk dial is the weakest link in another wise strong release. The VSF116610LN (black) is a better rep in this respect. ZF Hulk dial was marginally better but I have read/seen on this forum that the ZF dial is not enough of an improvement to warrant replacing the VSF one, it's a little darker but mostly because it is still wrong. Now if you want a Hulk dial that kicks ass, you need to source a BP dial - show 'em KJ..
It's more for the OCD people. 90% of the time you would do fine with a BP on the wrist lol. Though up next to gen no replica can stand.
Better avoid wearing mine near my friends in that case ????
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RE; ZF pics just posted..
The CG's look more similar to the early 116610, though I still feel they are a hair's width too shy but they are the next best to VSF imo.. and they look better than any refinished gen 116610, which by the way there are thousands with fucked CG's and folk pay £10,000+ for them so it matters not a whisker!
I'm talking about how VSF CG stick out more. Once you see it it's instant tell. Mac posted a pic of the backs. You can see where I highlighted why the CG looks bad in the front. Also if you look closer at the edges you can see why the VSF feels sharp in hand and gives some people that cheap feel. It's just because it wasn't properly finished. Soften the edges would do wonders for it.
The VSF is how it’s supposed to look. It near perfectly mirrors a new 116610.
The Gen on left is older and clearly has been polished which results in softer CG’s without the “ski slope” shape.
The VSF is how it’s supposed to look. It near perfectly mirrors a new 116610.
The Gen on left is older and clearly has been polished which results in softer CG’s without the “ski slope” shape.