Fake watches on Instagram - share them here

[JDuBois]

Gen or rep? Just come across this was curious. What are the gives if so.

 

[Lindt]

Gen or rep? Just come across this was curious. What are the gives if so.

It is gen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chris3007]

Gen or rep? Just come across this was curious. What are the gives if so.

Gen, easy to spot at the DW and the 3126 movement of course [emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone 6

 

[occidio]

Delete this post, made a seperate post about it

 

[ryantunna]

This was posted by a reputable gen dealer on Instagram.
Looks a little fishy to me, anybody know anything about the sky dwellers? Date mag seems totally off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trique6]

This was posted by a reputable gen dealer on Instagram.
Looks a little fishy to me, anybody know anything about the sky dwellers? Date mag seems totally off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That date mag looks really fishy to me, however the 24hr complication on it matches up to the dial, which afaik isn't common on most reps. on the other hand, the hands could have been adjusted to match the 24hr complication, and not the other way around.

Date mag looks really fishy though like you said, in addition to being too high up in that date window. The newer models are especially accurate with those things, as the Skydweller is the most complicated movement Rolex has made to date if I recall correctly.

 

[peterpl]

^ The date on that Skydweller looks so fake its not funny

 

[Ezio]

Sky dweller is fake no doubt about it.

 

[HeavenStorm]

Read somewhere that gen rolex are having issues with those cyclops. I saw a gen BLNR with one of those ugly 1.5 cyclops too before

 

[fradic]

Skydweller is not fake, its genuine. Rolex have had problems with the cyclop.. They wont ever aknowledge that tho. I have seen some subs that look like pos on the date. Im talking about 2015-> versions.

 

[FLWatchGuy]

If you look at the Skydwellers on Chrono24, a lot of them have cyclop magnification that look very similar. I would have a big problem if I paid that much for that watch and got such a crappy cyclop mag.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[mattyVDB]

This is hilarious. I wish I could pick out reps vs gen that easily.

 

[MrSaltey]

Gen or rep? Just come across this was curious. What are the gives if so.

Obviously GEN! Just look at the movement, forget everything else.. Or just look at the rotor! Beautiful

 

[rgercya]

Have u guys ever seen fake watches from Instagram?
I don't see them very often but when I do, I post them on forums

its funny the people liking his pictures are considered "gurus" on instagram... hmm

 

[Dusk]

Come on this batman has to be fake. Please someone humour me?

 

[QueTip]

Come on this batman has to be fake. Please someone humour me?

That's a gen.

 

[Dusk]

That's a gen.

??? Really. What about the sel fitment on the left hand lugs and the date mag? Surely the date mag is way off??

 

[QueTip]

??? Really. What about the sel fitment on the left hand lugs and the date mag? Surely the date mag is way off??

Rolex doesn't give a f about the date mag anymore. There are so many out there with date mags way lower than 2.5x.

It has CHS and dial, hands and insert is gen. There is no way one could get those parts to build a franken of it.

 

[Dusk]

Rolex doesn't give a f about the date mag anymore. There are so many out there with date mags way lower than 2.5x.

It has CHS and dial, hands and insert is gen. There is no way one could get those parts to build a franken of it.

Thanks for the reply. It looks crappy with low mag. Shame standards have slipped!

 

[QueTip]

Thanks for the reply. It looks crappy with low mag. Shame standards have slipped!

I kind of like it that way. Give me a few minutes. I'll dig out a good pic to show you.