**[[ EVALUATION Thread ]]** PAM 411-420-Boutiques Edition -***[[[ Poll CLOSED ]]]****

[MarkTS]

this is H-factory 2012 new release watch... it's good quality so far. and noobfactory maybe will make it too. hope noobfactory will upgrade the casing engrave quality. and will review some noobfactory panerai watch .

 

[Mambo]

I voted for super rep status, overall a very nice rep ... !
Lever might be slightly pointy on some of them and caseback not as crispy ( depth of engraving )
And the rollerball is too fat ....

But who cares, it looks good LOL

 

[Mr.RadioActive]

A SuperRep goes above and beyond, Boutique Quality side by side a really tough one to figure out which is which. I vote Keep First Class. There is nothing that makes this above and beyond. Voting super rep because you simply like this model or think its fairly accurate don't make it super IMHO.

We need to be cautious of a very good rep, that every one likes being called a super rep. Yes maybe it is Super to have it, maybe its Super to own one, Maybe its Super that it was released but Super when compared to Gen is a big difference.

Super could also sometimes be added to reps that have something in them self that make them ultra valuable or well out of the normal rep watch range.

 

[negatron]

Anyone seen a rep of the new Singapore Edition, PAM 432? Noticed we have no posts about that one at all.

 

[ALE7575]

Anyone seen a rep of the new Singapore Edition, PAM 432? Noticed we have no posts about that one at all.

Please friends
Keep this thread just in Evaluation of the Boutiques M-series from H maker.
In order to have it clean and tidy for futures users.
Thanks
ALE

 

[marlin2284]

I don't own any of these watches and I tend to go more for the open back case watches, but judging buy the comparisons, it seems like they are nice reps. The open case backs are susceptible to more inconsistencies compared to the gen. because the movement is clearly visible. I think they are good quality reps. and a good addition to anyone's collection.

 

[Mr. Pap]

I voted for the super rep upgrade also! I think H factory has delivery a very good rep once again comparing it to the gen...

 

[ALE7575]

Definitive Evaluation

The evaluation of ;
PAM 411-420 Boutiques Special Editions from H maker is already closed

IMPORTANT: If you make click in the quantity of votes on the POLL you will get the names of the members who have voted for each option, in order to know what are the votes of the members having your trust.

Since there is a vote of Chromed no included in Super reps and considering only the votes for First Class rep and Super rep we have the results of the POLL as follows

SUPER REP________26 votes____57%
FIRST Class REP____20 votes____43%

Really is not a very conclusive result, but that will happen many times in the future and we have to take a result of the Evaluation to be included in the PAM REVIEW-GUIDE.

PROPOSAL : To consider the Evaluation of this replica as Super rep indicating the percentage of votes, and the link to consult the evaluation thread as follow:

EVALUATION: (**) SUPER REP [57%] (H maker)
Evaluation thread: http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/evaluation-thread-pam-110268

In this way people can know the percentage of members who have voted this replica as Super rep. and to consult quickly the thread of evaluation with all comments and votes.

THE EVALUATION IS A DATE USEFUL FOR ALL MEMBERS, THREFORE IT MUST BE DONE FOLLOWING THE PEOPLE WHISES. PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ONE.

PLEASE, confirm whether you agree with this system or you have another better idea

Many thanks to all people participating in this Evaluation

Regards
ALE

 

[ALE7575]

Please we need your replies to my last post !!!

EVALUATION IS INTERESTING FOR ALL PEOPLE

ALE

 

[ALE7575]

Please we need your replies to my last post !!!

EVALUATION IS INTERESTING FOR ALL PEOPLE

ALE

Really people are always asking for Evaluations but don't want to participate in them.

Please reply my above post. I need your opinion

ALE

 

[Sora]

i have no idea if the noob 111 crown guard is correct for this version, because the surface finish and the size of the crown guard seems to be different for the 41x and pam111 noob. any expert care to chime in??

 

[ALE7575]

Definitive Evaluation**************

I REPEAT THIS POST BECAUSE I HAVE NOT HAD ANY REPLY ABOUT IT
REALLY PEOPLE LIKE THE EVALUATIONS BUT DON'T TAKE AND ACTIVE PART IN THEM !!
THIS IS VERY SAD AND A LITTLE SELFISH !!


The evaluation of ;
PAM 411-420 Boutiques Special Editions from H maker is already closed

IMPORTANT: If you make click in the quantity of votes on the POLL you will get the names of the members who have voted for each option, in order to know what are the votes of the members having your trust.

Since there is a vote of Chromed no included in Super reps and considering only the votes for First Class rep and Super rep we have the results of the POLL as follows

SUPER REP________26 votes____57%
FIRST Class REP____20 votes____43%

Really is not a very conclusive result, but that will happen many times in the future and we have to take a result of the Evaluation to be included in the PAM REVIEW-GUIDE.

PROPOSAL : To consider the Evaluation of this replica as Super rep indicating the percentage of votes, and the link to consult the evaluation thread as follow:

EVALUATION: (**) SUPER REP [57%] (H maker)
Evaluation thread: http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/evaluation-thread-pam-110268

In this way people can know the percentage of members who have voted this replica as Super rep. and to consult quickly the thread of evaluation with all comments and votes.

THE EVALUATION IS A DATE USEFUL FOR ALL MEMBERS, THREFORE IT MUST BE DONE FOLLOWING THE PEOPLE WHISES. PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ONE.

PLEASE, confirm whether you agree with this system or you have another better idea

Many thanks to all people participating in this Evaluation

Regards
ALE

 

[the_don_robinson]

Hi Ale, I think its a sensible approach \ system. Majority always wins, so this must be a super rep... We can always reevaluate once more info comes out and reopen voting at that time I guess.

I have a newly acquired gen 428 which looks the same as this boutique range (to me at least!) I think its a diff year though. Anyhow if we need pics let me know and I'll do some for comparison purposes.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9810 using Tapatalk

 

[sharrkey]

Would a poll created at the end of a closed evaluation be a better option, my reason for this is people's opinions may change on deciding if super rep ect once reading posts, comparing pics ect ect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ALE7575]

Hi Ale, I think its a sensible approach \ system. Majority always wins, so this must be a super rep... We can always reevaluate once more info comes out and reopen voting at that time I guess.

I have a newly acquired gen 428 which looks the same as this boutique range (to me at least!) I think its a diff year though. Anyhow if we need pics let me know and I'll do some for comparison purposes.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9810 using Tapatalk

Many thanks tdr for your reply and your interest.
Yes we always will be able to do another pol,l you are right. This is not a definitive and closed thing. In fact we will need to re-evaluate when we have new versions.

Although the 428 is N-series and maybe a watch with different features or details, it will be intereting to get some good pics of the gen in order to have them for future comparisons, when we have the replica.
Many thanks again for your kind coperation.
ALE

 

[ALE7575]

Hi Ale, I think its a sensible approach \ system. Majority always wins, so this must be a super rep... We can always reevaluate once more info comes out and reopen voting at that time I guess.

I have a newly acquired gen 428 which looks the same as this boutique range (to me at least!) I think its a diff year though. Anyhow if we need pics let me know and I'll do some for comparison purposes.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9810 using Tapatalk

Many thanks tdr for your reply and your interest.
Yes we always will be able to do another pol,l you are right. This is not a definitive and closed thing. In fact we will need to re-evaluate when we have new versions.

Although the 428 is N-series and maybe a watch with different features or details, it will be intereting to get some good pics of the gen in order to have them for future comparisons, when we have the replica.
Many thanks again for your kind coperation.
ALE

Would a poll created at the end of a closed evaluation be a better option, my reason for this is people's opinions may change on deciding if super rep ect once reading posts, comparing pics ect ect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Sharrkey
You are completely right ! And I agree with you ! That would be the correct system.
But it is very difficult to "movilize" all people just for "one" Evaluation.
You can see how many times I'm asking people for a simple reply or vote in this thread!!
Al last, and with the cooperation of many kind members and also the PCTeam almost complete, we have a very complete Evaluation.
If we would need again to "movilize" people for a votation in a Poll, we will have a half of people! Unfortunately.
Next time, I will try to ask members, who don't know completely the rep under evaluation, for posting their replies after they have read and studied more information about the watch.

Thanks Sharrkey you are being very helpful around the PAM Section and a big asset of PCTeam. Please, keep in this way, we need it

ALE

 

[ALE7575]

Final Evaluation

Final Evaluation PAM 411-420 Boutiques Special Editions from H maker

SUPER REP________26 votes____57%
FIRST Class REP____20 votes____43%


IMPORTANT: If you make click in the quantity of votes on the POLL you will get the names of the members who have voted for each option, in order to know what are the votes of the members having your trust.


This Evaluation will be included in the PAM REVIEW-GUIDE

EVALUATION: (**) SUPER REP [57%] (H maker)
Evaluation thread: http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/evaluation-thread-pam-110268


Many thanks to everyone having participated in this Evaluation

Regards
ALE