- 13/12/16
- 1,917
- 873
- 113
This is a 116520 dial. The text in 116500 dials is differentIncredibly frustrated - Waited 6 weeks for a v3 dial and this is what I’m offered……
It’s not v3 is it? Looks shiny to me?
This is a 116520 dial. The text in 116500 dials is differentIncredibly frustrated - Waited 6 weeks for a v3 dial and this is what I’m offered……
It’s not v3 is it? Looks shiny to me?
What dial is this? Clean or BTF?
It's a gen.What dial is this? Clean or BTF?
Completely gen.Gen dial and gen case or gen dial and clean/ BTF?
Well let's hope he does because the guy asked for a Daytona 116500 CF V3 dial and got a 116520 dial.Erik is very easy going guy. He would change anything until his customer happy
No it's not as shiny. As I said before in this thread, the gen shiny variations are only shiny in very harsh direct light and in very bright direct sunlight.One gen 116500 dial variation is shiny and one not. If as shiny as BTF, I don’t know. But definitely more shiny than CF the new one. The shinyness is in general not so much a problem, as at least two variations exist in gen world. Rather the thickness of the subdials and the quality of the subdials in general as well as the crispness of all the printed text and its thickness. Bad crown shapes or marker shapes are also directly visible.
For me yes! CF betterLa cornice della versione 3 è migliore della cornice BTF V2?
So is there a V3 dial for the 116520 yet or is it still the same dial with shiny, fat subdials?