• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

[CONSENSUAL LIST] Super Reps NWBIGs

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple
UPDATE : Tag Heuer Carrera calibre 1887 V6F - Ceramic Bezel Black Dial on SS - Moved to NWBIG because of the display case back not being 1:1, still looking great tho.
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
Glad to be of service. What stood out to you on the faceback?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple
View attachment 98050 How about the Omega Ploprof? Just picked on up next door and everything I’ve read points to Nwbig, that is unless you plan on diving 4000ft down...

Well, we're not here to discuss watches. This thread is to discuss flaws. So, you should discuss a particular watch in the section of that watch brand and then discuss the flaw here to know if we should consider :)
 

Tucker

Lunnyfied by Raddave
Supporter
Certified
23/12/11
18,003
10,481
113
Well, we're not here to discuss watches. This thread is to discuss flaws. So, you should discuss a particular watch in the section of that watch brand and then discuss the flaw here to know if we should consider :)
Huh?
 

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple

Yeah, right, we've been saying that for 46 pages now.

This thread is not to discuss a watch. If you want to add a watch into the list, just say it, but let us hear about discussions you've got or possible flaws.

Suggesting a watch is not enough. We need infos. What are the tells, how bad are they ? If you don't know, you're supposed to discuss it elswehere.

If you do know, just tell us. If you did your homework and found no flaw, that's right, let us know about it too and I'll add it to "under discussion". :05.18-flustered:


So, @tframo, are you aware of any tell ? Can you tell us more about it ? What are the differences you've spotted ? Any comparison/review thread to share ?
 

xpletiv

I'm Pretty Popular
3/3/10
1,144
1
36
So, @tframo, are you aware of any tell ? Can you tell us more about it ? What are the differences you've spotted ? Any comparison/review thread to share ?

Wouldn't that^ be discussing a watch?
 

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple
So, @tframo, are you aware of any tell ? Can you tell us more about it ? What are the differences you've spotted ? Any comparison/review thread to share ?

Wouldn't that^ be discussing a watch?

Let me show you.

Discussing a watch the wrong way : Hey guys, do you think we should consider this watch for the list ? I love it and I think it looks great.
Discussing a watch the right way : Hey guys, this particular watch has this small flaw and this small flaw only, but it's nearly invisible and I think it's good enough to be a Super Rep, what do you think ? Or maybe NWBIG ?

Again, we've been saying this for 46 pages now, please respect the way this thread was built by all these members. :)
 

Daryl80

Getting To Know The Place
6/10/12
72
9
8
Hi all

Maybe echo everybody's responses and thank Omagad for putting this together and more challenging in keeping this current.

May I submit my request to the collective here on the Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso tribute to 1931. (either Us or normal version)

This gained some infamy as it was a watch that one of the trusted dealers here issued a survey to everybody for a presence dress watch them commissioned a factory to build it.

Here is the link (however as it's pages long, have started when the QC photos started coming in)

http://www.repgeek.com/showthread.php?191886-Poll-for-Reverso-1931-v-Grande-Taille/page39

Apologies if its not a superrep though am keen to get an opinion. Consensus suggests the following errors which may inhibit it from this category but please do advise on your thoughts
1. Wrong movement (can't see as it's a closed case but it's a quartz
2. The etching of 'a' on the back looks like a 2
3. Reverso font fractionally thinner
4. Tip of hands not round enough

Anybody else done a compare to gen review that can give some insight

Thanks again all

Sent from my E6853 using Tapatalk
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
As somebody who has still a lot to learn I´d like to thank Omagad and everbody who gave its thoughts and insights.
Amazing thread, very helpful list.
 

Time87

Known Member
26/6/16
106
7
0

NWBIGs (FIRST CLASS) but refused as Super Reps :

Bell & Ross 03-92 ZF (not the Golden Heritage one that has a very bad Dial)
Bell & Ross 03-92 Horolum Watch Achive Custom
Bell & Ross 03-93 GMT Watch Archive Custom : review
Blancpain Fifty Fathoms (Noob V2)
Breitling Navitimer World (black only) BP
Breitling Avenger Blackbird (GF/ GF V2)
Hublot Classic Fusion 42mm JJF black dial (V2) - Back is wrong and screws are randomly falling
IWC Portofino White Dial V4 MK
IWC Portuguese 7 days ZF (last version)
IWC Black 3714 - ZF V2 (slim movement)
Omega Seamaster 300 Spectre KW/V6F V2
Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600m 42 and 45mm (CrPO) Noob
PAM 687 - Acciaio Brevettato SF (only tell is open caseback)
Rolex 114300 (BP)
Rolex Yachtmaster Rhodium/Blue Noob SA3135
Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610 Noob V6s/V7
Rolex Submariner 114060 No Date B-C Noob V7
Rolex Day Date 18239 TW Best/WM9
Tag Heuer Carrera calibre 1887 V6F - Ceramic Bezel Black Dial on SS
Tudor LHD Pelagos - ZF
Tudor Black Pelagos - ZF V2/V3

hi,
may i ask, "IWC Black 3714 - ZF V2 (slim movement)" refer to which timepiece?
tried checking intime, i only get to find ZF V2 in Gray dial as for the rest of the 3714, it seems to be v3 instead.
Following link is the "ZF V2" in gray dial:
https://www.intime01.co/iwc/3532-po...brown-leather-strap-a79350-slim-movement.html

Also, regards to the movement commented in the link, it claims to be "Much more reliable than the previous A7750 modified movement."
Any idea, how true is it?
I tried to search for more infos regards to movement but can't seem to find any...


kindly advise..
thanks all!
 

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple
Hi all

Maybe echo everybody's responses and thank Omagad for putting this together and more challenging in keeping this current.

May I submit my request to the collective here on the Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso tribute to 1931. (either Us or normal version)

This gained some infamy as it was a watch that one of the trusted dealers here issued a survey to everybody for a presence dress watch them commissioned a factory to build it.

Here is the link (however as it's pages long, have started when the QC photos started coming in)

http://www.repgeek.com/showthread.php?191886-Poll-for-Reverso-1931-v-Grande-Taille/page39

Apologies if its not a superrep though am keen to get an opinion. Consensus suggests the following errors which may inhibit it from this category but please do advise on your thoughts
1. Wrong movement (can't see as it's a closed case but it's a quartz
2. The etching of 'a' on the back looks like a 2
3. Reverso font fractionally thinner
4. Tip of hands not round enough

Anybody else done a compare to gen review that can give some insight

Thanks again all

Sent from my E6853 using Tapatalk


Hello, thanks for that. I have no knowledge of this model but regarding the flaws you listed, it certainly can't be a Super Rep. What makes you think it should be NWBIG ?
 

Omagad

I'm Pretty Popular
10/11/16
1,570
869
113
Super Reps Temple
hi,
may i ask, "IWC Black 3714 - ZF V2 (slim movement)" refer to which timepiece?
tried checking intime, i only get to find ZF V2 in Gray dial as for the rest of the 3714, it seems to be v3 instead.
Following link is the "ZF V2" in gray dial:
https://www.intime01.co/iwc/3532-po...brown-leather-strap-a79350-slim-movement.html

Also, regards to the movement commented in the link, it claims to be "Much more reliable than the previous A7750 modified movement."
Any idea, how true is it?
I tried to search for more infos regards to movement but can't seem to find any...


kindly advise..
thanks all!

I don't understand the issue regarding the version.

For the movement, I suggest you check in the movement section ?

Thanks for your input.