-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
CF Pepsi picture leaks BLRO
- Thread starter wolfiqar
- Start date
Well I’m sure someone will enjoy this piece then as it will be passed to someone else. The resolution of the QC pic obviously isn’t as good once pasted here as it is when received in the mega app. The bezel engravings 6 and the 18 also have two totally different surface finishes from the red side to the blue side… the ‘platinum’ coating on the red half looks very rough and sticks out like dogs balls. I will try to capture it and post here
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just got my QC pictures. Sure the transition is pretty obvious in these pictures but looks overall good i think.
Use imgbb.com or rwi clix pix
That said... your version looks amazing. That's a greenlight for sure!
Last edited:
- 30/12/14
- 714
- 151
- 43
Strange. I see them in Tapa but not via desktop. Thanks mate
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk Pro
Replisimio
I'm Pretty Popular
I approved mine this morning. Date a fraction high but not really a big issue, may add a gen dw anyway. Possible transition line but I think it will be ok in the flesh.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- 30/5/21
- 1,416
- 4,170
- 113
Since you rejected it, next time check that the QCs photos are from the same actual piece (check serial number). For example, I saw MFK100 's post #767 where he posted his QCs and last pic has different serial number than the rest...
Agree, i am waiting my Qc, hope this one will be intended for me, mate...the only issue i really can not overcome, is the date alignment, and this is not so bad (a little on the left, as for other from CF)
- 30/5/21
- 1,416
- 4,170
- 113
Received my QCs today! Overall happy with the result and oyster bracelet sits well on the lugs. SELs are good and recess is there. Clasp is on point too. However I rejected the watch already for 3 main reasons. 1st being the different font on number "3" in rehaut serial number (one is flat other is rounded). 2nd being the scratches on bezel insert around the 6 and 18 areas (looks like insert has been forced in the bezel ring and some damage is there or it's just residue and not sure if it can be fixed. 3rd is the thick dots and logo on the crown. Last reason isn't so important as every other sample I've seen in this thread has it so I guess it's a CF thing but the first two are a deal breaker. Pics below for your reference and comments.
The serial number font was a dealbreaker ?Received my QCs today! Overall happy with the result and oyster bracelet sits well on the lugs. SELs are good and recess is there. Clasp is on point too. However I rejected the watch already for 3 main reasons. 1st being the different font on number "3" in rehaut serial number (one is flat other is rounded). 2nd being the scratches on bezel insert around the 6 and 18 areas (looks like insert has been forced in the bezel ring and some damage is there or it's just residue and not sure if it can be fixed. 3rd is the thick dots and logo on the crown. Last reason isn't so important as every other sample I've seen in this thread has it so I guess it's a CF thing but the first two are a deal breaker. Pics below for your reference and comments.
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
- 30/5/21
- 1,416
- 4,170
- 113
As it's written, watch is rejected for 3 reasons. All 3 are clearly mentioned. And yes, serial number font is one of them. If you zoom in you will see that first "3" is flat and different than the second "3" that is rounded.
Can't see it on my phone. I assume you've used something much bigger
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
Björn_Ironside
I'm Pretty Popular
Yes, The different 3 are visible .. but for example for me that will not be a problem from RL.
rather the external wear of the bezel at points 6 and 18 is much more serious for me and that's why I would give RL too. looks worn / scratched
- 30/5/21
- 1,416
- 4,170
- 113
- 30/5/21
- 1,416
- 4,170
- 113
Yes man the wears are obvious and I really can't understand how they occurred compared to all the other samples we've seen so far in this thread.
You better hope you don't get a 3 in the second half of your serial because the flat 3 is the same in others. They're probably all startcthe same. The damage would be the only reason I would rl
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
- 21/4/19
- 1,806
- 2,158
- 113
