• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Building a GMT Master Ref. 16750 the successor of the Ref. 1675

WatchN3RD

I supported. Doesn't make me an expert!
Gold Patron
24/7/18
564
652
93
Still very impressed how you "easily" just dropped a 3186 in a 2836 case. Constantly doing some impressive stuff. I missed the bezel information though. Are you still using the Raffles bezel assembly for budget friendly purposes, or did you replace it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1il1i

matzemedia

Active Member
Certified
22/4/21
395
775
93
Germany
Still very impressed how you "easily" just dropped a 3186 in a 2836 case. Constantly doing some impressive stuff. I missed the bezel information though. Are you still using the Raffles bezel assembly for budget friendly purposes, or did you replace it?
The two movements are not so far different in terms of dimensions. I was surprised that I had to adjust anything at all on the case.

Yes, the bezel is the one from Raffles. It has a few differences to the construction of the original but works. May be once I will invest into more gen like.
 

matzemedia

Active Member
Certified
22/4/21
395
775
93
Germany
Today I have mounted a Jubilee bracelet at the GMT Master. In the most cases you will find a Qyster (78360) bracelet, but I am a big fan of the Jubilee - and it was possible to choose it that time.

Here you can see a picture.


In my option the endlink is to small. I have found some pictures with the same small endlinks - but still think they are not correct. Here you can see the small gap in detail. May be I need some 550 endlinks.

 

EnryDJ36

In search of perfection
5/11/23
128
177
43
Italy
wonderful journey and exceptional result! (y)
Today I have mounted a Jubilee bracelet at the GMT Master. In the most cases you will find a Qyster (78360) bracelet, but I am a big fan of the Jubilee - and it was possible to choose it that time.

Here you can see a picture.


In my option the endlink is to small. I have found some pictures with the same small endlinks - but still think they are not correct. Here you can see the small gap in detail. May be I need some 550 endlinks.

Keep in mind that there must be not too much space but there is a difference between the case and the terminals.
Good work
 

1il1i

Unusual Whale
Supporter
20/9/23
59
74
18
Texas
This was amazing work and is inspiring. The 1675 and 16750 is on my list and I may have to build one because I'll never be fast enough to buy one in the M2M sections. Thank you for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matzemedia

WatchN3RD

I supported. Doesn't make me an expert!
Gold Patron
24/7/18
564
652
93
This was amazing work and is inspiring. The 1675 and 16750 is on my list and I may have to build one because I'll never be fast enough to buy one in the M2M sections. Thank you for sharing.
Matz has some great talent. I love his builds.

Please keep them up, brother!
 
  • Like
Reactions: matzemedia

Yellowhammerwatches

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
26/1/24
179
541
93
Without access to a lathe is there a poor man’s way to modify the inner dimensions of the case to fit that movement?
 

DelRey

Do not accept unsolicited offers
7/12/24
2
0
1
Have you had trouble with the DWO binding on the back of the dial? The dial spacer is just a bit short. I’m afraid of adding a shim because it may affect dial hand placement if the dial is raised to fit the date wheel overlay clearance.
 

matzemedia

Active Member
Certified
22/4/21
395
775
93
Germany
Have you had trouble with the DWO binding on the back of the dial? The dial spacer is just a bit short. I’m afraid of adding a shim because it may affect dial hand placement if the dial is raised to fit the date wheel overlay clearance.
I am not sure if I understand your question correctly. I used a 3186 movement - there is no dial spacer. The DWO is not touching the dial. That is all straight forward - just plug and play.