ARF SD43 904L 126600 review (many pics)

[Hakai]

magnification looks good imo. Nice one you got there !!!
ore concerned about the belt haha...

 

[Alex1976]

​ Still trying to upload pictures but somehow not able to :-(!​

 

[Bigred7078]

Always fun to wear!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Alex1976]

Ok, uploading pictures works now . Thank you very much for all the help.

Now I only need to learn how to take decent pictures of this beauty hahahaha.

 

[Alex1976]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[PgrPgrPG]

Got mine today , feel like they are a bit overhyped. Im loving what ARF are doing but i wouldn't say super rep.
Bezel movement feels cheap
Date wheel has misprint/dirt on a couple dates
Mag cyclops appears magnification improved over earlier models but position is too high on the xtal so cuts off the bottom of the date at normal vieweing.
Bracelet screws where a right bastard same as on my ARF Daytona , threaded, stiff and jammed had to be plyered out. Screw slots fit my gen screwdriver on some and too small on others.

Sorry for your so/so experience for your ARF watch mate. Are you sure it’s SD43V2 ?
I ask because I’ve received mine a couple of days ago and don’t get any of the flaws you did mention. For sure I would have been quite worried about that.


Sent from the RWI App PgrPgrPG

 

[rrr27]

Is the belt rep? where did u buy it?
jking ????
looks great !

Nope, belt is the only thing gen


Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapa

 

[Hakai]

JDM180 should have sen this at qc, no?
Or did u get a different watch?

 

[JDM180]

JDM180 should have sen this at qc, no?
Or did u get a different watch?

Last time I mentioned rejecting QC on here I was lynched so lowered my expectations. Besides would have not spotted any of this apart from the date but the angle of the qc mag looked ok and didn't get a pic on the mucky date

 

[Hakai]

Your money , so reject what ever you like.
which TD? I hate it when they manipulate the QC

 

[JDM180]

Your money , so reject what ever you like.
which TD? I hate it when they manipulate the QC

Rather not name them as didn't reject in first place .

But yeah it sucks

 

[Hakai]

Well saw that you got the problems with the noob v9 as well damn son!
really sorry

 

[PsychoTee16]

thanks mates

Ill see what more responses I get over the next week or so and see what I can do

I am super intereasted in a Prof Crystal with no cyclops! Vac actually tried to take mine off with no success, so I think he actually contacted you!

The sooner the better as I want one of your crystals without the cyclops!!

 

[rnrprof]

I am having them made at my factory in Germany now but it will be about 30 days before I have them back from the lab

 

[Hakai]

Probably will be a new batch incoming. Talked to Sead who said he can't get some right now probably back in stock inin o or two weeks so...

 

[Patrick_Rolex]

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

 

[Tucker]

Last time I mentioned rejecting QC on here I was lynched so lowered my expectations. Besides would have not spotted any of this apart from the date but the angle of the qc mag looked ok and didn't get a pic on the mucky date

So its the fault of other members who gave you a hard time about rejecting QCs that caused you to lower your expectations and receive a shitty watch? Come on. Maybe we should have finished that lynching and put you out of your misery.

 

[JDM180]

So its the fault of other members who gave you a hard time about rejecting QCs that caused you to lower your expectations and receive a shitty watch? Come on. Maybe we should have finished that lynching and put you out of your misery.

Give it a rest you sad tucker

 

[minwas]

Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

 

[Tucker]

Give it a rest you sad tucker

Rest? I’m just getting started.