Why would I go to the bother of taking pictures of my watches then finding a way to post them them to this site to prove a point to a maniacal moron like you ? You have spent ten pages with pictures of watch cases and still haven't proven your point . The pictures you have posted are obviously taken from the internet . You keep going on about fake watches not being like a genuine watch . I agree with this , you posted a picture of a JF Explorer I pointed out the glaring mistakes . My argument is that the case shape on the JF 114300 isn't one of them . I have handled both gen and fake watches , and the JF 114300 is the best attempt by fakers at copying a Rolex watch . Imo there is nothing wrong with the case shape .
This seems to have really gotten under your skin especially as non of your photo displays have proven anything . Also somebody has posted a genuine / JF case comparison that shows you are wrong . So you have now started on a different tact calling me a liar , going on about people trying to pass fakes off as gen , telling me fakes look nothing like gens and constantly referring to Subs . I'm neither of the first two , and never said the last one .
I think I have understood your posts they are very hard to understand , and written in pigeon English . However I'm not sure what derogatory terms are used in your country , but here in the UK you would be described as a grade A cunt .
) and don't be so picky, otherwise the only choice is buying a gen (and of course unsubscribe from this forum)
