I’m not a Sub guru but I have owned a Gen 116610LN, a Franken 116610LV, a Noob V6s and a Noob V5. So have seen and held a few examples.
It’s the best looking Rep Sub I’ve seen but it wouldn’t be a rep without a few flaws.
The SEL despite looking good are pretty loose.
The pearl is off centre and looks like whoever lumed it used 100 parts chromalight to one part binding agent. It’s constantly blue and when fired up can be seen from space. It doesn’t match the dial and hands.
The crown is pure garbage it’s rough, really rough. It also scrapes against the insides of the crown guards when wound into the case.
The bezel feels cheap to turn.
This is me being hyper critical though, as I said it’s the best looking rep subC I’ve seen.
The hands are beautiful, the lume on the dial and hands is perfectly applied.
The insert engravings look very close to gen, yes a few are a bit close to the xtal but the depth and colour are amazing and the black ceramic really pops.
The Xtal does have the black hole and in some lights looks gen but does have the blue hue.
The rehaut shines whereas my Noobs were dull and the engraving looks great and lines up well.
The clasp is very well finished and has soft rounded edges like Gen and snaps tightly shut.
The DWO is much much better than I anticipated, it’s only really a very few dates in the high twenties that look off the rest look really good. If I’d have seen this I wouldn’t have bothered with the Gen replacement.
Overall it’s a very good Rep but has just enough flaws to remind you you are wearing a cheap (ish) Chinese toy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk