KJ2020 thanks for the clarification mate! very helpful
so the new arf rep is a 116520 with a custom dial and bezel
If noob copies the SS version the bezel is wrong?
Here's a simple differentiation between NOOB vs ARF
=> ARF: mimics the 116506 PLATINUM version. Simply because ARF has added all the Platinum certified stamps on the back of the watch.
In which case the major give away would be the SEL not protruding like in the platinum version as shown here: https://www.chrono24.sg/rolex/dayton...-id9089913.htm
=> Noob: mimics the 116520 stainless steel version because of the lack of the stamps as described above
In which case the major give away would be the bezel fonts. "UNITS PER HOUR" is narrower on the new bezels. The old ones seem to be a bit more on the regular side.
You can see a reference at this link: https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/dayto...-id7528854.htm as described by KJ2020.
Or if you do a quick Google search here: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Dayto...-/263416360449
Accuracy wise, I'd say Noob is closer because there is NO SUNBURST on the sub dials on the stainless steel version (and nobody would ever notice even if there was). And the bezel is easily replaceable. Whereas getting a protruding platinum looking bracelet is a bit harder or much more expensive...
Did Rolex secretly release an ice blue stainless steel version? Or are you looking at "custom" versions that have been modified with either a gen or custom dial and bezel. Most of the 116520 models I've seen with an ice blue dial clearly state "custom", and even those that didn't specify generally feature a dial and bezel look like hell.
I only know of ice blue in the 116506, post-2013, and I understood that Rolex only uses ice blue on Platinum models (which also have a different case shape).
And all of the genuine Rolex 116506 ice blue dials have sunburst subdials.
Noob has the wrong subdials Instant tell for me
Here's a simple differentiation between NOOB vs ARF
=> ARF: mimics the 116506 PLATINUM version. Simply because ARF has added all the Platinum certified stamps on the back of the watch.
In which case the major give away would be the SEL not protruding like in the platinum version as shown here: https://www.chrono24.sg/rolex/dayton...-id9089913.htm
=> Noob: mimics the 116520 stainless steel version because of the lack of the stamps as described above
In which case the major give away would be the bezel fonts. "UNITS PER HOUR" is narrower on the new bezels. The old ones seem to be a bit more on the regular side.
You can see a reference at this link: https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/dayto...-id7528854.htm as described by KJ2020.
Or if you do a quick Google search here: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Dayto...-/263416360449
Accuracy wise, I'd say Noob is closer because there is NO SUNBURST on the sub dials on the stainless steel version (and nobody would ever notice even if there was). And the bezel is easily replaceable. Whereas getting a protruding platinum looking bracelet is a bit harder or much more expensive...
[h=2]4130 MOVEMENT[/h] [h=3]Model features[/h]This is a very striking watch. Does anyone know if the 4130 movement is proprietary to Noob, or will other manufacturers have access to it?
What are you talking about??
where on earth does noobs Version mimic a SS Daytona? It has a 116506 case with plat hallmarks and also the correct lug shape. It looks nothing like a 116520. only the SEL is wrong which is a turn off and looking like SS Daytona.
[h=2]4130 MOVEMENT[/h] [h=3]Model features[/h]
The Cosmograph Daytona is equipped with calibre 4130, a self-winding mechanical chronograph movement entirely developed and manufactured by Rolex. Its architecture incorporates far fewer components than a standard chronograph, thereby enhancing the movement’s reliability. Like all Rolex Perpetual movements, the 4130 is a certified Swiss chronometer, a designation reserved for high-precision watches that have successfully passed the Swiss Official Chronometer Testing Institute (COSC) tests. The chronograph movement features a Parachrom hairspring, offering greater resistance to shocks and to temperature variations.
Thanks for the post - I was meaning have Noob an exclusive use of the clone, or is it available to the likes of ARF?
Am I the only person that actually prefers the ARF recessed Sels to the Gen protruding ones?
I've said it before, I'll say it again:
'ARF; Better Than Gen'