SEL are still wrong. Come on ARF, this is not that difficult, stop reusing the damn bracelet.
How can you say that SEL looks wrong from the back of the watch?
Sorry, I reformulated my post after seeing the pics on Puretime: how exactly are the SEL wrong? I understand they are supposed to be different from the steel model, but how exactly?
Sorry, I reformulated my post after seeing the pics on Puretime: how exactly are the SEL wrong? I understand they are supposed to be different from the steel model, but how exactly?
That has something to do with the shape of the lugs mate. And if you look closely you can see the SEL sticking out - but I'm fairly no RLX connoisseur... So please excuse my lack of understanding hehe
The middle part, sure, but that's normal. I'm talking about the sides - take a look at that picture vs the ones I posted. On these endlinks, the side pieces are raised up (they are much close to being as high as the polished center piece, which makes them protrude out past the lugs) - on the normal SS endlink, the 2 side pieces are dropped down significantly from the center , and sit entirely within the lugs
given that it is SS and how the endlinks are, why is the rep not labelled 116520 (instead of 116506)?
https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/dayt...tch-ice-blue-dial-brown-insert--id7528854.htm
Lol pretend lolLikely the same way they generally replicate white gold: Use polished stainless, and pretend it looks the same.
Like the Rolesium models.
The 116520's are SS models with SS bezels. Rolex never made them like the one you linked. That's a custom dial and bezel, like this one
https://wannabuyawatch.com/product/rolex-daytona-ref-116520-custom-dial-ceramic-bezel/
The dial on the one you linked is bad, the color is off and the subdials dont have their own sunbursts like the gen has.
This is the model I wish somebody would rep. Love the ice blue, hate the brown. Ice blue with ICE!
Agreed. I hate the brown - it's the colour of a 1970's dinnerware set / bathroom suite.