• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

ARF 116506 Ice Blue

BIONONE

Put Some Respect On My Name
28/4/17
3,566
2,728
113
looks like they also got the sunburst per each sub dial correct - which noob didn't. color looks promising too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vcappp

tr573

Renowned Member
17/10/11
796
87
0
SEL are still wrong. Come on ARF, this is not that difficult, stop reusing the damn bracelet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vcappp

tr573

Renowned Member
17/10/11
796
87
0
Sorry, I reformulated my post after seeing the pics on Puretime: how exactly are the SEL wrong? I understand they are supposed to be different from the steel model, but how exactly?


Sure - see circled in red on these. Like the original rolesium yachtmaster , the SEL on the platinum daytona protrude out past the lugs. The SS /Gold bracelets do not.



Rolex-_Daytona-_Platinum-watch-10.jpg


Rolex_Daytona_Platinum_2.jpg



ROLEX-_DAYTONA-116506-_BLUE-_DIAL-_PRICE-_US71870-31.jpg


It looks like ARF here has used the regular SS model endlinks, as they are sitting nice and snug entirely inside the lugs
 

BIONONE

Put Some Respect On My Name
28/4/17
3,566
2,728
113
That has something to do with the shape of the lugs mate. And if you look closely you can see the SEL sticking out - but I'm fairly no RLX connoisseur... So please excuse my lack of understanding hehe :D

Old Ceramic ARF:

omg2018081507-12.jpg


New ARF ICE BLUE:

rlx2018090701-10.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: vcappp

tr573

Renowned Member
17/10/11
796
87
0
That has something to do with the shape of the lugs mate. And if you look closely you can see the SEL sticking out - but I'm fairly no RLX connoisseur... So please excuse my lack of understanding hehe :D


rlx2018090701-10.jpg



The middle part, sure, but that's normal. I'm talking about the sides - take a look at that picture vs the ones I posted. On these endlinks, the side pieces are raised up (they are much close to being as high as the polished center piece, which makes them protrude out past the lugs) - on the normal SS endlink, the 2 side pieces are dropped down significantly from the center , and sit entirely within the lugs
 

BIONONE

Put Some Respect On My Name
28/4/17
3,566
2,728
113


The middle part, sure, but that's normal. I'm talking about the sides - take a look at that picture vs the ones I posted. On these endlinks, the side pieces are raised up (they are much close to being as high as the polished center piece, which makes them protrude out past the lugs) - on the normal SS endlink, the 2 side pieces are dropped down significantly from the center , and sit entirely within the lugs

now i got you. Sorry again ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tr573

tr573

Renowned Member
17/10/11
796
87
0
No worries! This is a bugaboo of mine, because all these factories used to make the 16622 YM with these endlinks, but they keep churning out reps of this daytona and not getting it right for some reason.
 

KJ2020

Time Traveler
Supporter
12/3/18
32,783
59,021
113
given that it is SS and how the endlinks are, why is the rep not labelled 116520 (instead of 116506)?

https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/dayt...tch-ice-blue-dial-brown-insert--id7528854.htm

The 116520's are SS models with SS bezels. Rolex never made them like the one you linked. That's a custom dial and bezel, like this one

https://wannabuyawatch.com/product/rolex-daytona-ref-116520-custom-dial-ceramic-bezel/

The dial on the one you linked is bad, the color is off and the subdials dont have their own sunbursts like the gen has.
 

tr573

Renowned Member
17/10/11
796
87
0
^^ Yup. Rolex only puts glacier blue dials on platinum watches. Daydates and the platona. Anything else is an aftermarket dial
 
  • Like
Reactions: vcappp

stoyania

Active Member
15/4/16
360
42
0

Fat Dave

Active Member
1/6/13
288
172
43
Australia
Is PureTime finally coming to the realization that they really don't need six thousand watermarks obscuring the entire watch? I mean, the actual product pictures still seem to have a billion, but in those previous pics, you can actually see most of the watch!

ahhhh, so refreshing.....

Yes, even that single watermark is completely oversized and still obscures detail, but at least you can see most of the photo now.