No I have eyesDo you have the genuine?
No I have eyesDo you have the genuine?
Well they must not have worked when you compared the left side.No I have eyes
Yes. Like the time when we told you ZF was Shit, you said oh no it's perfect, advised your friend to buy it and then sold it again, saying it's yours? Hm. Don't get smart boy.Well they must not have worked when you compared the left side.
So so touchy. That was a genuine question by the way, if you had the genuine, no pun intended. You write with such authority and a stance of expertise. I figured it was a good question. You know for someone that talks a lot of noise, I would figure you would have the stomach to receive some of your medicine. Even though that wasn’t my genuine intention.Yes. Like the time when we told you ZF was Shit, you said oh no it's perfect, advised your friend to buy it and then sold it again, saying it's yours? Hm. Don't get smart boy.
The left side of the case is wrong. The right side also.
On the left side of the case, the curvature of the lugs into the roundness of the bezel shouldn't be as steep as it is. It should be more straight, more sleek overall.
Yea I'm not reading that, get back on topic bubbeleSo so touchy. That was a genuine question by the way, if you had the genuine, no pun intended. You write with such authority and a stance of expertise. I figured it was a good question. You know for someone that talks a lot of noise, I would figure you would have the stomach to receive some of your medicine. Even though that wasn’t my genuine intention.
Funny you call me boy (I won’t take that as a racist remark) when you are clearly an old man acting like a prepubescent teen (who by the way have dysfunctional ideologies of manhood) bringing in irrelevant insults to the matter at hand. Nothing against older men, most I’ve interacted with here are gentlemen. I don’t know anything about these models or could care less too, I figured I would share my knowledge because that is what this site is for. And when I do care about something, I bring in technology to bring me an informed opinion. Much better than eyes IMO.
But all you do from your posts is insult and bring negativity. When 5Digits said he purchased the black one, you laughed. When your friend CTbegoreLP bought the Panda, you refrained from mocking him.
If I figured you were so touchy, I wouldn’t have responded. But noted. I figured a man would know and stand corrected when they are wrong (true aspect of manhood by the way). If that’s what you meant by the left side, then I stand corrected. But the bezel ring does not protrude past the case as you implied for the left side.
I'm just gonna say yes and act like I read thatAnd I didn’t advise my friend to buy it. He already did. That wouldn’t make sense now would it. You know with time (as we all here have a deep admiration for, or I would hope so anyway, we are talking watches) and logistics. How could that happen so quickly. In actuality, I absentmindedly brought your conclusions of the watch to him which made him nervous (my fault). So I took it upon my self to help correct the wrong via the doubt and negativity that I unintentionally introduced, by buying his watch and selling it.
Wondering the same. It doesn't look like a decorated movement, appears to be another clone of the 4130... It has the regulator arms facing the outside like the DD, but it's not as nicely finished, and the reverser wheels are a very bright red.What movment do they use? Decorated a4130?
Brother, case is not at all correct. Only lugs are.As far as I can see from this TD pics, the AR+ one have only the crown with wrong dots.. case is correct, crystal seem to be with the right shape, dials are correct ..maybe Daytona printing is not wit the right red color.. but we are only at V1.. and currently we don't know anything about Clean and BT.. let's wait a bit more... but overall this AR+ is promising !
Dial is not bad, even the 116500s are not better from any factory and they making it for a years… so, dial is definetly not badBrother, case is not at all correct. Only lugs are.
The easiest thing: thickness
Couldn't even manage that.
If you like it, I'm happy for you, but neither dial, nor case, nor bracelet nor bezel are correct.
I don't have one in hands..so basically I say this from what I can see from pics.. in fact I wrote... AR+ is promising but let's wait for Clean and BT.. I already saw a teaser from Clean last week...Brother, case is not at all correct. Only lugs are.
The easiest thing: thickness
Couldn't even manage that.
If you like it, I'm happy for you, but neither dial, nor case, nor bracelet nor bezel are correct.
The teaser is from RolexI don't have one in hands..so basically I say this from what I can see from pics.. in fact I wrote... AR+ is promising but let's wait for Clean and BT.. I already saw a teaser from Clean last week...
Clean has shown pictures of the gen watches they are taking apart to make the watch.Apart from arrogant and frustrated problematic children who treat others like fools... @Neo_7 I ask you which teaser CF are you referring to? it would be very interesting
Imagine that, if one doesn't ask questions that are clearly posted in several threads, I can answer normally.Not an arrogant response, very strange
Hahaha ya it does look like ass, especially the movement. But I had to put an order in anyways. I've always wanted to rock the Daytona but the 116500 were always so small on my wrist and found myself selling them as soon as they came in.CF haven’t teased any pictures of their watch - just pics of a gen.
And the AR+F is still ass.
You know it's the same size bro yes.Hahaha ya it does look like ass, especially the movement. But I had to put an order in anyways. I've always wanted to rock the Daytona but the 116500 were always so small on my wrist and found myself selling them as soon as they came in.
I'm hoping this one is somewhat closer to the actual dimensions of the gen 126500. I'll rock it until maybe the new cleans or BTFs come out.
AR+ super (shitty) 126500 is the same dimensions as the 116500 ???You know it's the same size bro yes.