• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Aqua Terra 38.5mm replica

English Gent

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
10/7/14
1,670
410
83
Gen 38.5mm AT is a bit to thick, and heavy due to movement, I got a rep version and was very happy with it, not as thick and heavy. Quartz version is thinner and very nice. esp old versions.

Heres 38.5mm and 39 mm old Quartz, plus a Sarb and Tissot Visodate, all great watches








 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
Gen 38.5mm AT is a bit to thick, and heavy due to movement, I got a rep version and was very happy with it, not as thick and heavy. Quartz version is thinner and very nice. esp old versions.

Heres 38.5mm and 39 mm old Quartz, plus a Sarb and Tissot Visodate, all great watches








Good collection!:)
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
The IWC mark XVIII is/was on my wish list too...but, I read somewhere that the lug to lug size is pretty high, near 50mm, little too long for my 6.25 flat wrist. I think this quest will end by just stacking more cash for a gen, a Sinn 556i :02.47-tranquillity:
Mark XVIII is not a greatest rep of Mark series. It will be in the future, probably. You should better consider Mark XVI, pretty the same thing, 39mm.

If you want to know my opinion:
1. Mark XVI rep
2. Sinn 556i
3. AT rep
4. SARB

Aqua Terra seems really cool if you want to have just one watch.
As for rep – to get or not to get depends on how ready you are to take some obvious flaws (like the movement).

SARB is the same as AT, a little bit more simple. (A lot of people have them nowadays, I've seen like 3 of them in a wild).

Not a fan of Sinn, though. Their simplicity seems forced to me, if you understand what I mean:)

Mark XVI is the best, imo. The rep of it is one of the best reps out there, probably a super rep (if they do exist).
You can install gen dial on it, and it will be as good as gen, literally.

I think you will be happy with whatever you'll choose.
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
Gen 38.5mm AT is a bit to thick, and heavy due to movement, I got a rep version and was very happy with it, not as thick and heavy. Quartz version is thinner and very nice. esp old versions.

Heres 38.5mm and 39 mm old Quartz, plus a Sarb and Tissot Visodate, all great watches








Could you share your impressions about AT rep? It is 38.5mm, right?
 

English Gent

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
10/7/14
1,670
410
83
Could you share your impressions about AT rep? It is 38.5mm, right?

The AT rep is very good, better in my opinion to the Gen in the pics, due to it feeling not as heavy and blocky. Gen is very thick and heavy.
 

magagne

Known Member
28/7/07
110
0
0
Today at my lunch time I visited the most biggest AD in downtown, and tried these:

  • AT 38.5mm gray
  • AT 41mm blue
  • Rolex Oyster Perpetual gray (39mm)

For the purpose of the rest of my post, I have a 6.25 wrist, thin, but flat, it can handle my Speedy Moon 42mmx48mm, but honestly, I found it limit. I confirm with two different vendors, at two different store and they confirm me that the size is not too big, limit, but still ok, and sport look. So, just to understand, SpeedyMoon is the max I can handle.

First, I tried the AT 38mm gray edition, I fall in love with it immediately. On my wrist it is perfect size, nice presence, simple and mature look, not too dressy, not too sport, great balance. I hate small watch (under 37mm, I'm really out). Bellow you'll find a list of all watches that I tried to understand where I come from.

After testing the AT MidSize, I decide to give a try to the Rolex Oyster Perpetual (39mm). It’s the the gray dial. Through the glass counter my first impression was it look bigger than the AT Mid. I know, 39mm instead of 38.5mm, but, 0.5mm it’s not a lot. So, for the purpose of the exercice, for a moment, forget number; height, dimension, weight, etc. I want to talk about perception & impression. I put it on my wrist and I was impress by clarity of the dial, perfect reading of the dial, and this crystal don’t has any AR. The gray dial pops-out so nicely, so beautifully, the sunburst is awesome, hands, indices. It’s an incredible watch, more dressier than the AT for sure but I prefer the impression and the feel of the AT more. The AT has a sport twist that I prefer. So I came back to the Omega counter and at the same time an another vendor put back a AT blue dial that was out for a wrist test for an another client. I said, [me] "wait a minute, I want to see this one, is it a 38mm too ?”, "no", said the vendor, "it's the 41mm version"… “Well, I was sure it was a 38mm too, let me tried this on my wrist I’m curious".... put it on my wrist, the balance was perfect and curiously the case is the same size of my Speedy that I found little "too big” for me. So “why the AT 41.5mm give me the impression that is less bigger than the speedy?” I asked to vendor!. Well, the vendor explain me that there's more than just the case size factor judge/consider, it’s an overall assembly, bezel, hands, dial, side height, finish, color, etc. Vendor convince and re-assure me, AT 38mm or AT 41mm, both are perfect, there's no winner here, there’s no reject. Just a question of preference and feel. After, I look back again on my dream watch, it is the SpeedMaster MARK II edition, but this one, due to the case design, the height, the bulk look of it, it's a fact, confirm by the vendor first, very not for my wrist, overkill, I need to forget it vendor said...you know, when a watch is your dream watch, and, never you will be able to wear it because the fit is just not right for YOU. So, to make a short story, don't just stop your purchase base on a size criteria, tried it on your wrist, ask vendor and people around you that can evaluate the overall look on you. Never reject a watch just by it’s case diameter. It’s more than just a question of case diameter, but a synergy with your wrist too, the morphology of your wrist, again here, never base your buy base on 7.5-8 wrist, 6.25-6.5 etc. of other people, because it can be a mesure of circumference of a flat wrist, a round, a skinny, etc. It can be a tall person, short person, heavy person, etc. it's a question of balancing, and, the "personality" of this watch give on you...maybe you like the watch, but, on you, it's just look silly....ask, never hesitate to ask other to receive input about perception.

My opinion is there one thing that is more important than the case diameter or any other size, height, weight parameters,etc. the most important, it’s the lug to lug size, if it pass over your wrist width, it’s a “big" no no no. Even if it’s a 38mm diameter. Pilot watch can be pretty long, near 50mm sometime, even if the diameter is 39mm, so be more careful about this mesure than any other one.

--------------


This is all watch I had and current one.


X: CURRENT
O: SOLD

_______________________
Gen:

O : Fortis B42 Pilot
O : Invicta (rolex look)
O : Luminox stealth F117
X : Luminox 3100
O : Luminox 3059 colormark Orange
X : Luminox 7051 Colormark 38mm (my current beater watch)
X : Omega SpeedMaster Pro Moon 2008 - Sandwich Sapphire version (My Graal watch, and daily one, but I found it little too big)
O : 2x Seiko Chrono with 7T92 mvt
O : Seiko SKX007
O : Seiko SKX013 (38mm version of the 007)
O : Seiko Monster
O : Seiko for GF
O : Speedbird III PRS-22 Ivoire
O : Sinn 356 (Hesalite crystal, solid case back version )
O : Sinn 142 (LEMANIA 5100 mvt)
O : Traser military watch type 3

_______________________
rep:

O : Breitling Navitimer (re-lume by Ziggy & double AR applied by RWG-Chief)
O : Breitling Avenger(wayyyyy too bulky, height was ok, but to heavy/bulky for my skinny wrist, but couldn't resist to try it)
O : Omega PO 42mm Orange (2006 version)
O : Omega PO 42mm Black (2006 version)
O : Omega PO 45mm Black (2006 version)
O : Omega Seamaster Chrono Diver 300 Blue (~ 2005)
O : Rolex - Sea Dweller
O : Rolex - Submariner Ceramic Blue dial
O : Rolex - Submariner Ceramic Black dial
O : Rolex - Submariner GMT
O : Rolex for GF
X : Tag Heuer for GF
O : IWC Aquatimer, Lucky 7 version (re-lume by Ziggy & double AR applied by RWG-Chief)
O : IWC Mark XV (My first rep, a really bad version, pure crap, I learn a lot from here)
O : IWC Mark XV (a better version, double AR applied by RWG-Chief)
O : IWC 3717 (MODed with swiss 7750, re-lume, double AR applied by RWG-Chief)

Take a looooooong rep break, and, watch itching come back again.... sooooo I'm back to watch forum.
 

imranbecks

I'm Pretty Popular
17/11/15
2,168
3,405
113
The Neutral Zone
Today at my lunch time I visited the most biggest AD in downtown, and tried these:

  • AT 38.5mm gray
  • AT 41mm blue
  • Rolex Oyster Perpetual gray (39mm)

For the purpose of the rest of my post, I have a 6.25 wrist, thin, but flat, it can handle my Speedy Moon 42mmx48mm, but honestly, I found it limit. I confirm with two different vendors, at two different store and they confirm me that the size is not too big, limit, but still ok, and sport look. So, just to understand, SpeedyMoon is the max I can handle.

First, I tried the AT 38mm gray edition, I fall in love with it immediately. On my wrist it is perfect size, nice presence, simple and mature look, not too dressy, not too sport, great balance. I hate small watch (under 37mm, I'm really out). Bellow you'll find a list of all watches that I tried to understand where I come from.

After testing the AT MidSize, I decide to give a try to the Rolex Oyster Perpetual (39mm). It’s the the gray dial. Through the glass counter my first impression was it look bigger than the AT Mid. I know, 39mm instead of 38.5mm, but, 0.5mm it’s not a lot. So, for the purpose of the exercice, for a moment, forget number; height, dimension, weight, etc. I want to talk about perception & impression. I put it on my wrist and I was impress by clarity of the dial, perfect reading of the dial, and this crystal don’t has any AR. The gray dial pops-out so nicely, so beautifully, the sunburst is awesome, hands, indices. It’s an incredible watch, more dressier than the AT for sure but I prefer the impression and the feel of the AT more. The AT has a sport twist that I prefer. So I came back to the Omega counter and at the same time an another vendor put back a AT blue dial that was out for a wrist test for an another client. I said, [me] "wait a minute, I want to see this one, is it a 38mm too ?”, "no", said the vendor, "it's the 41mm version"… “Well, I was sure it was a 38mm too, let me tried this on my wrist I’m curious".... put it on my wrist, the balance was perfect and curiously the case is the same size of my Speedy that I found little "too big” for me. So “why the AT 41.5mm give me the impression that is less bigger than the speedy?” I asked to vendor!. Well, the vendor explain me that there's more than just the case size factor judge/consider, it’s an overall assembly, bezel, hands, dial, side height, finish, color, etc. Vendor convince and re-assure me, AT 38mm or AT 41mm, both are perfect, there's no winner here, there’s no reject. Just a question of preference and feel. After, I look back again on my dream watch, it is the SpeedMaster MARK II edition, but this one, due to the case design, the height, the bulk look of it, it's a fact, confirm by the vendor first, very not for my wrist, overkill, I need to forget it vendor said...you know, when a watch is your dream watch, and, never you will be able to wear it because the fit is just not right for YOU. So, to make a short story, don't just stop your purchase base on a size criteria, tried it on your wrist, ask vendor and people around you that can evaluate the overall look on you. Never reject a watch just by it’s case diameter. It’s more than just a question of case diameter, but a synergy with your wrist too, the morphology of your wrist, again here, never base your buy base on 7.5-8 wrist, 6.25-6.5 etc. of other people, because it can be a mesure of circumference of a flat wrist, a round, a skinny, etc. It can be a tall person, short person, heavy person, etc. it's a question of balancing, and, the "personality" of this watch give on you...maybe you like the watch, but, on you, it's just look silly....ask, never hesitate to ask other to receive input about perception.

My opinion is there one thing that is more important than the case diameter or any other size, height, weight parameters,etc. the most important, it’s the lug to lug size, if it pass over your wrist width, it’s a “big" no no no. Even if it’s a 38mm diameter. Pilot watch can be pretty long, near 50mm sometime, even if the diameter is 39mm, so be more careful about this mesure than any other one.

That is a mouthful of a post..lol.. But some good points brought out in there. A watch needs to be tried first to be sure which one suits and feels better on your wrist. My wrist is 7". I can so far wear both the 38 and 41 case watches with no problem. 45mm case size is the biggest I can go for a watch. I do have one 45mm watch in my collection.

The 41mm AT fits me just fine and feels great!

34570929805_16ff7ae216_c.jpg
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
That is a mouthful of a post..lol.. But some good points brought out in there. A watch needs to be tried first to be sure which one suits and feels better on your wrist. My wrist is 7". I can so far wear both the 38 and 41 case watches with no problem. 45mm case size is the biggest I can go for a watch. I do have one 45mm watch in my collection.

The 41mm AT fits me just fine and feels great!

34570929805_16ff7ae216_c.jpg
I have the same 7" wrist, and I did not like the fit of 41 mm version :)
It's like some kind of big plate for me.
 

imranbecks

I'm Pretty Popular
17/11/15
2,168
3,405
113
The Neutral Zone
I have the same 7" wrist, and I did not like the fit of 41 mm version :)
It's like some kind of big plate for me.

I hear ya. It does indeed wear big because of the thinner bezel and more dial. But if you have been wearing other 41mm watches, then the AT in 41mm shouldn't be a problem. It's up to personal preference and comfort really. I tried on both and even have the quartz model in 38mm, so I know how both fits on my wrist. I'm comfortable with both sizes.

38.5mm
33198497155_3b96721677_c.jpg


41.5mm
34327249041_8577848441_c.jpg
 

magagne

Known Member
28/7/07
110
0
0
Can you share your input/opinion about the size of my gen Speedy (42mm) on my 6.25 inch wrist to base my next purshase (AT 38 - 41). I like presence/punch of a watch, but, due to my skinny forearm, I'm worry about the overall look. Better to downsize to a 38mm or continu with a 41mm in the AT line ?


IMG_1265.png

IMG_1256.png IMG_1262.png IMG_1264.png
IMG_1267.png
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1256.png
    IMG_1256.png
    470.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1262.png
    IMG_1262.png
    456.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1264.png
    IMG_1264.png
    460.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1265.png
    IMG_1265.png
    475.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1267.png
    IMG_1267.png
    454.2 KB · Views: 0

vanwolff

Renowned Member
Supporter
Patron
Certified
21/12/15
943
244
43
Germany
Can you share your input/opinion about the size of my gen Speedy (42mm) on my 6.25 inch wrist to base my next purshase (AT 38 - 41). I like presence/punch of a watch, but, due to my skinny forearm, I'm worry about the overall look. Better to downsize to a 38mm or continu with a 41mm in the AT line ?

Although I must admit that the Speedy is on the large end of the spectrum of watches matching your wrist size, it fits your wrist very well! There is no lug overhang, so it should be okay. In regards to the Aqua Terra, I would opt with the 38.5mm version. Due to the lack of a (rotating/tachymeter/whatever) bezel, thus sporting a very large dial relatively to the case size, the Aqua Terra tends to wear very large. Although lug 2 lug dimensions are not too long (and don't appear as long because of the lyre shape), I think the 41mm should be too large.

I favour the 2824 movement of the 38.5 AT's over the noisy and non-hackable Miyota 8215. Recently I've ordered an Omega AT and I expect it to arrive very soonely. I'll shoot some pics when it's here.
 

magagne

Known Member
28/7/07
110
0
0
I favour the 2824 movement of the 38.5 AT's over the noisy and non-hackable Miyota 8215. Recently I've ordered an Omega AT and I expect it to arrive very soonely. I'll shoot some pics when it's here.

Good point in favor of the 38mm if it just for a question of rotor noise... thank you to keep us inform about your first impression of the one you will receive. If I can ask, from what dealer you ordered ?
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
Can you share your input/opinion about the size of my gen Speedy (42mm) on my 6.25 inch wrist to base my next purshase (AT 38 - 41). I like presence/punch of a watch, but, due to my skinny forearm, I'm worry about the overall look. Better to downsize to a 38mm or continu with a 41mm in the AT line ?


View attachment 7222

View attachment 7219 View attachment 7220 View attachment 7221
View attachment 7224
It's seems a little bit too chunky on your wrist imo. I think that is due to the bracelet. Try a leather strap or something, it's going to be cool.
Although, you can also try 38.5mm Aqua Terra and see how it will fit. Probably better, but who knows?:)
 

magagne

Known Member
28/7/07
110
0
0
It's seems a little bit too chunky on your wrist imo. I think that is due to the bracelet. Try a leather strap or something, it's going to be cool.

I just flip from my leather/butterfly clasp, for bracelet for the summer season LOL!
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
I just flip from my leather/butterfly clasp, for bracelet for the summer season LOL!
Ahaha
Yeah, if you are happy with the fit of the bracelet and it does not feel like a giant chunk of steel hanging on your wrist, then you're good.
No lug overhang, as was mentioned before.
Btw, your watch is very cool I must say!
 

vanwolff

Renowned Member
Supporter
Patron
Certified
21/12/15
943
244
43
Germany
Good point in favor of the 38mm if it just for a question of rotor noise... thank you to keep us inform about your first impression of the one you will receive. If I can ask, from what dealer you ordered ?

I pm'd you due to the dealer only being a TD on RG and RWG.

I've read alot about the AT and it's sizes and the overall tenor was that the AT wears large relatively to its size. The 38.5 AT is considered to be comparable to a (5-digit) Sub. Additionally, one has to consider the thickness. The AT is nominally relatively thick at 13mm.

This is a 38.5 AT next to a 6-digit sub:
MC080748-X2.jpg
 

sishac

Known Member
5/2/07
199
28
28
How about this one? The blue Aqua-Tera 2500 with the mystery movement
...supposed to be an ETA 2892 I believe....beautiful watch!!!
fc75c09076f4b7b839d17275c3f45854.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jaredjohnson

Active Member
26/2/17
255
5
0
How about this one? The blue Aqua-Tera 2500 with the mystery movement
...supposed to be an ETA 2892 I believe....beautiful watch!!!
fc75c09076f4b7b839d17275c3f45854.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a beautiful watch indeed.
Newer versions are a bit, idk, sexier? But this one is a stunner, no doubt.
 

sishac

Known Member
5/2/07
199
28
28
Ha!!! On my wrist this is very sexy...trust me!!! Seriously, I remember seeing the gen of this watch in a authorized dealer window once...on a brown crock strap it was beautiful. This watch is scary accurate with the exception of the Omega dial logo that is connected wrong (need a loupe to see)....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk