korneevy Tigerdragon
Guys I don’t think your comments are in mutual conflict.
First Korneevy, going by your comment that owners of gen APs are qualified to comment, I own 12 (and soon to be 14) gen APs now. And in total I’ve owned over 30 at different times. Pics of some my watches are available on this forum if you care to do a search.
I agree with you that the printing on yours is flawless. The prints on most, if not all of mine are perfect too. I just haven’t scrutinized them all under a loupe. Just enjoying each of them at wrist-eye distance is good enough for me.
But what
Tigerdragon said is factually true too. Having worked on many gen APs, I have spotted printing flaws on some. They do exist and they are not all perfect. I will say about 99% of them have perfect printing and the remaining 1% do not.
You are hence both correct. Your 15202
korneevy is perfect and pleasing to the eyes. Congrats!
But tigerdragon pointed out a valid point too. Defects and flaws do exist in gen APs as well as other brands. I have numerous gen Patek and Rolex as well and I haven’t scrutinized the details but I won’t be surprised if I find minute imperfections in any of them.
You’re both arguing your own points, both of which can be true without making the other invalid. So let’s all get along shall we?
QueTip I think you have your share of gen and rep APs and can chime in objectively too bro.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk