timnic54 thank you so much for your insights and for your time to produce this genuine and solid thread.
Much appreciated
Thank you. I truly believe a watch must first stand up as a "Watch" in its own right. Next it can represent the watch it is replicating.
Don’t say don’t share don’t comment, haha is this Replica watches Discussion , or Brain surgery forum?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can see how maker poor compare with ZF , Olso they borrow aquanaut old model! for replication, but still 3k aquanaut better choice at the moment , I can’t believe they have clone movement with borrowed watch , I hope ZF finish this job and movement supplier allow to sell it for another makers..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They "make poor" compare with ZF? Dude my opinion of you is dropping by the second. THEY REPLICATED A PATEK PHILLIPE MOVEMENT. Think about it. Think about it again. REALLY think about it. Ok now tell me again they "make poor". My god mate, people like you are unbearable. If they just engraved the movement everyone would think this movement is massiveeeee jump from what was available before.
I Think he’s saying, you can see how they are an new producer with little money compared to ZF. Not that they made a poor watch. Also think he’s saying, All their money went into the movement and the case was an old production one from a different factory they housed it in.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lol for a sec I thought this was a 3000 usd rep, not just the factory name.. might get this and put it on leather, looks amazing imo
Thank you for the wonderful review! Would you mind sharing some photos of the clasp detail? Would love to see how it looks on wrist compared to the ZF clasp.