Subdial positions are all wrong. Date font too I believe.Just find in WeChat this version, I was waiting long time, and don't think this time they made something really good, but want to know if you guys consider it weareble. Don't know thickness, steel quite thick back cover.
I guess their movement is the "good" old A7750 again which means wrong subdials and a ca. 15 mm thick watch. The gen thickness is ca. 11.5 mm which means a huge difference in hands and on wrist. One (and maybe only) attractive character of these reps is their price which is ca. 10-20th part of the currently available HQ reps with alternative gen movement.
Where can I find more info about this HQ reps !?I guess their movement is the "good" old A7750 again which means wrong subdials and a ca. 15 mm thick watch. The gen thickness is ca. 11.5 mm which means a huge difference in hands and on wrist. One (and maybe only) attractive character of these reps is their price which is ca. 10-20th part of the currently available HQ reps with alternative gen movement.
HQ = high quality.Where can I find more info about this HQ reps !?
Try to ask TDs, Asian modders or WeChat sellers about APRO 26331 reps with CNC case and 1185 movement (eg. Cartier c205). Regarding panda () generally you can choose between gen and rep dials (the latest rep panda dial is very good).Where can I find more info about this HQ reps !?
I like this description: "with correct sub dials position same as genuine".
The rep ones are spaced too wide apart.Love that model and as a beginner, can I kindly ask in which way the subdial positions are wrong?