• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

126713 bracelet question

mowuee2

Renowned Member
Certified
1/11/21
656
185
43
EU
Yes that doesnt look liek a DD3285 When you change the hour hand to mover it forward do you turn the crown in a clockwise motion? The DD3285 Clone you have to turn the crown anticlockwise which is the same as on the gen, that looks like a decorated 3285 VR3186 movement to me which would mean it an early clean perhaps. The serial number on the rehaut is defo a clean SN.

I dont believe that the VR3186 is a direct swapout for a dd3285 in terms of case fit (someone with more knowledge than I might be able to confirm or deny that) i think the DD3285 is a gen spec size movement where as the 3186 movement is a little smaller and has been used in the 5 digits and the earlier 116710 models true to the gen world, the gen 116710 used the 3186 movement and the 126710 uses the newer 3285 movement, the cases are marignally different on the outside edge of the lugs where they are little slimmer. It maybe be that the internals of the case is also a little diferent on the gen for the new movement.

I do think that earlier models may have still used the Vr3186 decorated as 3285 and Im pretty sure they didnt have the sides plated when I was looking at them (which was what put me off not the movement so much) but I think its hard to tell as they wont be on many TD sites with pics anymore and there might have only been a small batch made to "test the water" I think it is a Clean model but as I said a very early one and either purchased a while back or that a factory had one on the shelf as a "new old stock" and shipped it un wittingly perhaps, if at the time the noone knew the differences between the movements and it hasnt been checked it would be hard to say it wasnt right. The plating on the sides is missing for sure but only by the model avaialbe now from fatories if its an older model then its not really wrong.

The part that is to be questioned is the age of the watch as its not a new model for sure but I still think its a Clean, just quite how old it is and if its been originally supplied recently or has been bought a while back and and then punted on as almost new is another question only the first 2 in the chain can answer really.

Ofcourse it is possible that its a parts swap out model with a Clean serial numbered case, when I enquired to Trusty about a Clean 116710LN late last year as asked the question on th case markings and the stamps can be hit n miss some of the newer models still use the 116710 cases and some of the retro 116710 models use the newer case with the 126 stamps which is also incorrect but as good as Clean are they are still a rep factory and and most buyers will never notice (its only worse on this one due to the gold plating).

I dug mine out of the watch box and took the back off and this is a Clean 126713 April build ish



Mods have asked for a reply so lets see what unfolds I guess.
thank you for you many insights! I ordered the watch end of december and it arrived in time mid/end january, I just couldn't pick it up earlier
The supplier picture and also @mrmckhansi 's picture both had the clean wrapping around it
I can share the photo if that's needed and if it's also okay for the seller?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TerryRobot

Stuvetjee

For all your RM Strap and Jewelry needs!
Vendor (Strap Maker)
Moderator Sales
Section Moderator
Certified
3/3/14
11,773
5,277
113
NL / Schweizer
thank you for you many insights! I ordered the watch end of december and it arrived in time mid/end january, I just couldn't pick it up earlier
The supplier picture and also @mrmckhansi 's picture both had the clean wrapping around it
I can share the photo if that's needed and if it's also okay for the seller?
Yes, please do.
 

Blitza

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
31/5/20
1,631
368
83
EU
Thanks for responding @mowuee2 hope we can sort this all out :)

Honestly i think you shouldve mentioned everything you doubted about the watch in your thread..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mowuee2

Stuvetjee

For all your RM Strap and Jewelry needs!
Vendor (Strap Maker)
Moderator Sales
Section Moderator
Certified
3/3/14
11,773
5,277
113
NL / Schweizer
Okay, so what are the resolving options we can do now? @mrmckhansi
 
Last edited:

TerryRobot

Active Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
489
381
63
Dunno in reality the original issue was that the watch wasnt Clean. This looks to prove that it was a Clean that was supplied but doesnt show if the sides were plated or if the movement was a dd3285 as would be the norm from a recent Clean GMT. It could as ive suggested before be an old stock first edition Clean GMT that had a VR3186 in them often just decorated to show 3285, and whilst I cant prove it, im pretty sure when i was looking the first ones on launch didnt have the side of the midlinks plated gold nor the sides of the end links and this was before the DD3285 movement was the defacto movement on Clean GMT's this could just be one of those that was in stock and so is a clean model just not the same version as would come out of the factory being built now.

I'd say that as Peter has refunded Blitza and these are now the only 2 parties really that are effected now
Peter is the one at a loss so it would be fair that as Blitza is now selling the watch on M2M that he gives the proceeds of that sale to Peter for being a kind person and offering the refund without question and perhaps any difference in his loss could be covered between

mrmckhansi

and

mowuee2


As a goodwill guesture? Everyone else along the way isnt really involved as they have all bought and sold without worrying about this.

This would seem the simplest approach as the new to be owner is aware of the issues as marked on Blitza sales post.

Not my decision though so just throwing this out there as a nice amicable solution?

Good luck
 

Blitza

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
31/5/20
1,631
368
83
EU
Case was identified as 116710 clean and the clasp. Thats about it
 

TerryRobot

Active Member
Patron
Certified
13/9/15
489
381
63
Case was identified as 116710 clean and the clasp. Thats about it
To be fair though these are reps! the case markings is a common issue where the model purchased does not always have the correct case markings as they will use "stock" cases that might have already been engraved and as most most QC do not remove the bracelets thats hard to show was not inccorect at the time of purchase. The original images dont really show the side anyway.

At present the only person at a loss right now is Peter and trying to ID the watch now is imaterial, the reality is that if Peter gets his money back to the same amount he refunded the world is back to the way it was before this thread started.

Which is best for everyone and there is a new owner who who will either be happy with it or not but is already aware of what he is buying. Jobs gooden and all done and dusted. :)
 

Endez

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
21/12/13
915
1,091
93
To be fair though these are reps! the case markings is a common issue where the model purchased does not always have the correct case markings as they will use "stock" cases that might have already been engraved and as most most QC do not remove the bracelets thats hard to show was not inccorect at the time of purchase. The original images dont really show the side anyway.

At present the only person at a loss right now is Peter and trying to ID the watch now is imaterial, the reality is that if Peter gets his money back to the same amount he refunded the world is back to the way it was before this thread started.

Which is best for everyone and there is a new owner who who will either be happy with it or not but is already aware of what he is buying. Jobs gooden and all done and dusted. :)
He is not the only person with a loss… @mowuee2 as well sold it well below his buy price. Anyway, it is not to us to decide as we are not mod and not involved in any transactions with this watch…
 
  • Like
Reactions: mowuee2

Repmaster1337

TC, WM9 interested❤️
Certified
9/9/19
2,298
1,699
113
Intresting read.
I just need to put this out here.
That bracelet from last picture with "904l steel" is def not Clean at all, either this is fake Clean or beacelet have been changes. To me the movement look like vr3285. That also tells me fake Clean.

Hope you get this solved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mowuee2 and Blitza

Blitza

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
31/5/20
1,631
368
83
EU
For me its also solved tho it would be interessting to find out what went on with this one
 
  • Like
Reactions: Endez

peter4103

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
1/7/17
780
373
63
European Union
Guessing, thinking or making assumptions will never lead to facts, so it will remain with tracing back the story line and listen to the explanations provided.

I think we did that and I think that everyone who has had this watch in their hands has received answers.
 

Endez

Renowned Member
Patron
Certified
21/12/13
915
1,091
93
Guessing, thinking or making assumptions will never lead to facts, so it will remain with tracing back the story line and listen to the explanations provided.

I think we did that and I think that everyone who has had this watch in their hands has received answers.

It was no assomption on my post. But if TD sourced a fake clean, or a previous version, buyers need to be aware. This why they are TD or not as well. And the mentionned TD is overcharging as they are shipped from EU. So yes, not only the involved parties need to know what happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mowuee2 and Blitza

Stuvetjee

For all your RM Strap and Jewelry needs!
Vendor (Strap Maker)
Moderator Sales
Section Moderator
Certified
3/3/14
11,773
5,277
113
NL / Schweizer
Guessing, thinking or making assumptions will never lead to facts, so it will remain with tracing back the story line and listen to the explanations provided.

I think we did that and I think that everyone who has had this watch in their hands has received answers.
maybe one slipped through the cracks of @mrmckhansi i dont know, hard to trace back since.