Most people are reluctant to tell people “your watch sucks” ... most people. Lol. so you shouldn’t see a lot of that, especially burried in a thread like this. You’ll find it more when it’s in the beginning of a thread. What’s the situation? Where and when did you get that watch?
Hulks are the most difficult watches to photograph because It looks different in sunlight than it does indoors than it does in cloudy/overcast light. That’s why you see the pics in this thread mostly taken in direct sunlight. Or under bright light. That being said, you showed a pic taken in dark light so some of the color analysis could very well be off but that insert color does look dark. But that is the least of your problems as this looks like it might be just a dh gate/2813 based on the color of the insert and the datewheel. The inlay numbers on the insert look pretty white and the markers look wrong (depth and size). The indices aren’t accurate their shape and position is also not correct. The lume on the indices is too white. The rehaut looks way too straight. The pearl is bad. The case shape is incorrect too. Do a google search and just look at some authentic models and compare them. You will see the differences.
usually, when looking at a watch to determine if it’s authentic, I look at the silhouette to see if it fits. Like before looking at any details, I look to see how it looks from afar. Think of it as if you’re looking for a woman you know in a crowd from afar. It’s too far to see her face, but you can see her body and her curves. You can see the color of her hair. You can see her height and generally tell her age. Like if you’re looking for your gf or wife who’s 28 years old, 5’7”, 130 lbs and in good shape. You’re not going to mix her up with an 82 year old, 350lb bald woman regardless of the distance.
It’s like youre showing us Gabourey Sidine and asking us to tell you why it’s not Gal Gadot. If that helps. Lol