- 2/6/21
- 35
- 4
- 0
Everything ? As in, it doesn't exist ?
OK, I'll let Tudor know you think it's crap - it's all gen except for the insert. It was a restoration project, but it looks like Tudor really screwed up with those models.
You've given the wrong answer.The right answer is 'it's not possible to tell, with any degree of precision if a watch is genuine or rep from just one pic'.
Just as it's not possible to tell if a watch is gen or rep by looking at the clasp codes - the clasp codes used are also used by the genuine manufacturers - in fact, that's where the Chinese factories get their ref' codes, the genuine manufacturers.
Well, it's been fun, but I have things to do - you play nice with the others now, you hear ?
Ok without insulting you. The dial of that Tudor sub is clearly reworked/relumed, rather badly i might add.
As for the serial number clasp codes. You still don’t get it. Yes they used the clasp and serial numbers from ONE (yes only one) genuine watch. Then they use the same clasp code and the same serial code number range on ALL of their reps. You see where this is going? Exactly, it very very unlikely that you will ever come across a gen watch with both matching clasp code and serial number range from a known rep factory. It never happens! Ever! You understand the concept of randomness?
I’ve come across real ST9 and E5N clasps but never in combination with a matching serial number sequence. Its just math and probability, quite an easy concept.