Thank you for the comparison! TC's watches are getting better everytime, im happy to have one, i love it.
You have the best rep sub available on the market without mod mate
Thanks for the pics, that's awesome for comparison. The TC looks great overall, but I love the lug holes and beveled lug edges of your gen 16610
Lukko, what were your impressions of the TC and why didn't you hang onto it?
Yes mate, TC V6 is an amazing watch!
It has some fantastic CG, identical to gen.
The tube is different.
The crown is slightly wides, but eye no one pays any attention to this.
The bezel insert of the is amazing, even the pearl is fabulous.
I think it's the best "not gen insert" available.
The dial is fantastic, it is the best dial rep I've ever seen. The indices and the lume application are fantastic.
The hands appear gen.
The clasp is wides and you see it by your eye, but I think it is due to the different variations of this watch.
I did not like the AR of the crystal, and the AR of the Cyclops. They are too blue for my taste.
The magnification of the Cyclops is not like gen is acceptable ... but there's just too much blue in RA cyclope.
H4 cannon pinion is also fantastic and the movement works well, the DWO is perfect. The date disc is perfectly centered.
Thanks!! Not sure we should compare pearls, if the insert on the gen is the original it's a tritium pearl. I'm kinda disappointed to see that the font is thinner on the V2. Is that the new PA bezel he is putting on the newest V6's? Ordered mine 3 weeks ago ant got an email saying mine would come with the new bezel and I'm wondering what is different about it?
Many users have complained that the new insert PA bezel does not rotate properly and that beyond that the teeth of the ring are shallower than the previous (more ugly to see)
My ring runs perfectly, and its teeth look beautiful deep ... so I do not think I have the new PA bezel (in my opinion, if I have the old one this is much better)
But this is the new bezel insert V2
