Then you do not want the TC hands
This not good info Woof. Based on the research I have done on this movement and based on the posts from other respected members that have successfully installed clark ETA hands on the "New 25J movment" (and have discussed it in this very thread!), the answer is: Yes, the "new Asian 25j movement" will take eta sized hands--so the TC hands will work. The TC dial will also work--by the way--with the same mods needed to fit the clone and swiss movements.
I did my homework on this movement and rather than be a dick and tell you to use the "search" feature (wink), I am going to give you a summary of what I have learned (not first hand, since I have never had the movement in any of my watches). First, this not the 21j movement--which is essentially a clone of a miyota 9015 (btw, the "21j" (also referred to generically as a 2813) actually has 23j so I have no idea why we call it a 21j--but don't let me get in the way of rep maker marketing) . Second, this movement is not the same as a DG4813. That is a completely different movement all together from both the "2813"/"21j" and this "New 25J" movement.
This "New" movement has actually been around for a few years, but is only starting to make its way into reps in the last year or so. It is based loosely on the eta 2824. As a result, it has the same placement for dial feet, uses the same hand sizes, has the same stem height, and uses the same dw as eta/clone movements. While the "New" is heavily based on the 2824, it is NOT a clone. The movement manufacturer dumbed down the design a lot, which allows them to product them faster and cheaper. This is evident in the date change mechanism which is a slow change (like a 7750), rather than the quick change at 12 we are used to with clones and eta movements. Shortcuts aside, it could be a reliable movement if the maker has decent QC (not sure whether it does or doesn't). With the benefit of the simplified, no frills design, the "New" movement is much cheaper than the eta clones, but are still more expensive than the run of the mill "2813" movements. The makers still end up saving a lot of money using these movements because they don't have to source different, hands, dials, tubes, crowns for their low end watches. This should be a win/win for everyone--assuming these movements are reliable. I have heard mixed things about the quality of these movements, but since I have no personal experience with them, I will defer to those who have gone the "new 25j" route to weigh in.
Now that I have written up this nice explanation and helped you guys out, maybe you can help me! Does anyone here know whether BP is using a H4 canon pinion on the clone/swiss versions? Maybe one of you guys that own a clone or swiss version can take a macro picture of the canon pinion for me?!?!?!? Thanks!!!
Note: My original post had a harsh tone that, with some thought after the fact, was unwarranted. I edited this post accordingly.