I assume the watch with the date set to 8 is gen and the other is a rep?
The first thing I noticed with the watch set to the 8th was that the 11 and 7 looked so much better. The 11 is straight, and the seven has a different font with a vertical flat bevel at the top right. Then I noticed everything else as well. Middle circle, logo font. Hmmm...
I wonder why everything is so inaccurate on this rep dial. I feel like it was designed by a police sketch artist that never saw the watch.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
wow alot of flaws even on the new ring one on the date window is thinner ,, and the numbers espeically the 1 are much more square on gen, on this rep version they are rounded looking ,, i like the caseback however very thin and more correct ,, it may sit better on the wrist however , one of the things i didnt like about the rep roos with chrono that few mm thicker for me is really noticeable, ,, what to do , either have carbon diver sides wrong but great dial or have this better case and dial problems ,, might just stick with diver 3.5 , lol