Sometimes I worry the couple of the markers is different to the gen but then the light hits it in a very similar way to the AD lights and you realise just how close this rep is to the gen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Out of interest what has changed your mind with the Orf? on Pyrojr99 QC pictures of an Orf a couple of weeks ago you said the watch looked good now your saying its terrible.
It was out of courtesy telling a happy person “looks nice” and it does looks nice actually but that doesn’t mean it’s a good replica compared to the VSF or a Gen. There’s videos of this on YouKu side by side and people on Reddit saying how terrible it is, even the Chinese think it’s bad.
It was out of courtesy telling a happy person “looks nice” and it does looks nice actually but that doesn’t mean it’s a good replica compared to the VSF or a Gen. There’s videos of this on YouKu side by side and people on Reddit saying how terrible it is, even the Chinese think it’s bad.
elconquistador that centre decoration is a plate that is glued to a screw undereath. Mine broke loose when turning it. I glued it back to the screw when I was done. That screw needs to come out to remove the rotor, and then the deco housing
OK, so I just got the Omega Seamaster NTTD from GF and I can compare it with VSF v2 version.
The VSF’s version came with Milanese bracelet, albeit wrong by shape, buckle etc. so I used to wear it on rep nato strap.
I could only compare both watches with with plenty of GEN photos, at various angles and light directions.
My observations:
CASE:
VSF_v2 has a tiny bit darker titanium used comparing to GF. It is more dull and light absorbing. Considering the bracelet is SS instead of titanium - GF version is better suited to match SS shine than VSF version. The case execution is of bit better quality on GMF watch; HE valve has little distance from the case body, as per gen.
BEZEL:
GF bezel is clearly better executed - NO play in any axis. It was bone dry but some silicone oil did help. The digits on bezel are closer to GEN while on VSF version V2 - they are too thin.
SAPPHIRE:
both are wrong:
- GF version is a bit too flat
- VSF version is too „swollen” with way too much distortion
Comparing with photos - the GEN is something in between of these two. I would like to choose VSF but it’s distortion is too much for me.
CASEBACK:
- the GF version is harder to open, which is good
- the engravings are deeper on GF than on VSF_v2
- the engravings on VSF_v2 are darker than on GF one
- the fat engravings on VSF are closer to gen
- casebacks are not interchangeable
THE MILANESE BRACELET:
GF - correct shape, narrowing from lugs to buckle, correct buckle. Made of SS instead of titanium. A bit different wire pattern but close.
NATO STRAP:
- GF - wrong buckle, wrong loops, more shiny which is pleasing to the eyes
- VSF - correct buckle, correct loops
Both: a bit wrong woven pattern; VSF is clear winner here.
MOVEMENT:
Both watches used 2824 with decorative plates. Both have balance cook regulating knobs hidden under that plate… It is not easy to get access to these knobs :/
LUME:
GF has better lume, especially on bezel.
SUMMARY: it is a mixed bag. I would choose GF anyway. Give me better crystal and I would be happy
Both are pain in the … when trying to regulate.
BOTTOM LINE:
Pity there is no chance for VSF to release better version, with better sapphire, better bezel and lume.
Photos (GF is on the bracelet):
Thank you. I'm going to remove the rotor and decoration and put a better quality 2824 rotor on.
but you werent scared to tell the other guy his was shite. you keep sharing others opinions. maybe you must get the ORF as well and form your own opinion to share with us.
The dynamic of the conversation was different, I don’t have to throw my money away for an ORF just look at the YouKu video side by side. You seem to have a problem with videos whether its a review coming from one of the best Gen watch dealers on the world or by experienced people who compare Reps. The caseback on the ORF can even be opened by hand and sometimes doesn’t even align. If you care about the guys in this community why do you want them walking around with something that can easily be spotted as fake?
first of all, the VSF also had the issue with the loose caseback.secondly the ORF doesnt scream fake. most people wouldnt even know what you have on your wrist. thirdly, and actually most important is that it is pointless to keep showing everyone how perfect VSF is, as it's irrelevant. they dont exist anymore. whats the point in getting people all hot for the VSF if they wont be able to get one. ORF is not flawless, but its the best there is now.
I am starting to think you are a ORF/GF seller, from my experience it’s only you guys who get upset when someone shares the Truth because it draws sales from you. VSF does not have any issues with the caseback, I am wearing it now! stop arguing and watch the video so you can stop making yourself look foolish.
Oh, so it is a fake 8806 basically is a 2824 and not a true clone like 3135, 3235, which is good meaning a Swiss ETA can be put into the watch
Great comparison info!