I had jv v7, v9.5 (bold inner), zf. ZF is the best out of 2! Just one thing i dont like about ZF was the cyclop, too glare.Would you rather have JF v7 or ZF ?
Thanks
I had jv v7, v9.5 (bold inner), zf. ZF is the best out of 2! Just one thing i dont like about ZF was the cyclop, too glare.
For JF v7, i will mod it to fantasy watch option:
1. Ceramic bezel or rubber clad bezel with v9.5 dial and DW
2. Diamond bezel and v9.5 dial with gray/gold shimmer top coat.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Just ordered the 15703 along with the VSF Yachtmaster. Does anyone know if the ZF is actually available through TDs (in my case puretime)?
Lucy and Li told me that the ZF 15703 is out of stock, maybe back in two weeks.
Lucy and Li told me that the ZF 15703 is out of stock, maybe back in two weeks.
The Confucius voice in my head tells me, "if you grab what's available, you'll get what's left." Or maybe that's the confused voice. :lolcina:If you are not rushing wait a bit. For me unfortunately it wasnt avaliable and I couldnt wait longer, already had few declines on other watches. I got the JF because it was avaliable and I am happy with it. No matter what model you go with you will love it if you can get it.
The Confucius voice in my head tells me, "if you grab what's available, you'll get what's left." Or maybe that's the confused voice. :lolcina:
Whatever! While I haven't a clue if it is actually the case, I think it is likely that the people who have no wait (or a short wait) are the ones most likely to get QCs that people who waited longest previously rejected. Assuming my theory is correct, waiting on incoming inventory may not be a bad thing.
Patience is bitter but the fruit is sweet. :sFun_oldguy:
That could be the case. Or that everyone is now 100% convinced the ZF is the best out there and now everyone wants it. While a JF to me is an amazing watch and compared to a gen is extremly close (both JF and ZF are not 100% perfect and both have issues). But when few people say one is for sure the best so the rest will just go with it and miss out on a great watch because someone else said something. I looked over and over comparing the two againts a Gen and it is impossible to tell the difference unless its a high quality up close photo. Then you get the watch and see just how small those what looked big differences. In the end I am extremely happy with my JF and the alignment is perfect which is what I wanted. So in the end you do whats best for you. And with rep world people want the best while they pass up a amazing watches that are miniscule off from gen that only people here who are fans of the watch will notice if you are 1ft away from them. Lol
Again not bashing on ZF as I also wanted the best as I was told here. But just wanted to say JF is an amazing compromise if not avaliable.
Objectively, if I have to pick on a single feature of the JF diver which is an instant tell, it’s the datewheel. The factory may have copied the Mikey classic datewheel and it’s just sad awful. The Mikey modern font was on the other end of the spectrum and was the best aftermarket AP datewheel for me.
Same for the hands, it’s an eyesore.
So while I agree with you that the ZF is a rep also and isn’t perfect, I AM saying that given a choice I will buy the ZF diver. It is up to the individual to make his own choice but your reasoning works as well for a DHgate AP diver: someone will find it appealing. Same for the old noob diver. Someone will find each of them acceptable for the price.
If I see a JF diver in the wild, I will be able to tell that it’s a rep from a restaurant table distance. For the ZF I will need to study it closer. These are facts which apply from my experience.
You may find the need to defend the JF diver because you own one and you’re right in saying that neither (also including the dhgate reps and everything in between) are gen but given the choice I’ll pick the ZF over the JF any day (not that I’ll wear any AP rep). Let everyone work out their preferences for themselves. The differences between the two are objective and not subjective.
Very informative post, thanks Legend...interestingly the NWBIG thread has the JF diver and not the ZF. Imagine thats down to a lack of expertise from whoever is deciding the list?
Also dont want to derail the topic but do you feel the same way for the 15500 Royal Oak re the restaurant table distance?
Actually, I do not believe in nor do I subscribe to any "NWBIG" list created by someone else simply because its a very subjective one. We should not let others to decide for us what is NWBIG and what isn't. The same tell may matter more to someone than the other. Another guy may know about all the flaws but decide that the watch priced at $500 is "worth" the price compared with the gen priced at say $25k. In short "worth" is a very individual thing, so how can there be consensual agreement on this? It all depends on how much spending power one has, the flaws he can live with and what he cannot, and the kind of environment and social settings he wears the watches in correct? Put a "NWBIG" watch who has no confidence to pull it off and it will still appear awkward. Put a DHgate rep on someone who has the millions in the bank and nobody will question it. So what exactly is NWBIG? It is up to the individual to define it, and not something which applies uniformly to the entire community.
So forget about the list created by someone and make your own. I don't peruse that list at all so I am not sure what is on it nor am I interested. I make my own judgements on the reps based on the gens I own and my own research and observations. And my list works for me alone.
For the modded 15500 black, silver or blue, they are a lot harder to call out than the grey. The stock rep has a cheap dial finish and yes I can tell they are reps from table distance based on this and not the hands or datewheel or case. Remember that gen Royal Oaks (specifically the 15400 and 15500), exude a fair bit of the "Je Ne Sais Quoi" factor and this is accentuated by the attitude and confidence of the owner.
Thanks Legend, for your opinions developed with knowledge and other interventions, a great thread where I have learned a lot about the ZF model and the replicas in general.
Let's enjoy what they are.
Objectively, if I have to pick on a single feature of the JF diver which is an instant tell, it’s the datewheel. The factory may have copied the Mikey classic datewheel and it’s just sad awful. The Mikey modern font was on the other end of the spectrum and was the best aftermarket AP datewheel for me.
Same for the hands, it’s an eyesore.
So while I agree with you that the ZF is a rep also and isn’t perfect, I AM saying that given a choice I will buy the ZF diver. It is up to the individual to make his own choice but your reasoning works as well for a DHgate AP diver: someone will find it appealing. Same for the old noob diver. Someone will find each of them acceptable for the price.
If I see a JF diver in the wild, I will be able to tell that it’s a rep from a restaurant table distance. For the ZF I will need to study it closer. These are facts which apply from my experience.
You may find the need to defend the JF diver because you own one and you’re right in saying that neither (also including the dhgate reps and everything in between) are gen but given the choice I’ll pick the ZF over the JF any day (not that I’ll wear any AP rep). Let everyone work out their preferences for themselves. The differences between the two are objective and not subjective.
What I said was sure the ZF may be a bit better, but if for some reason you cannot get it and want a good AP the JF is a good 2nd option. Thats it. For me and many its not a eyesore looks extremely close if not really close to gen for majority of people....Not someone as educated as yourself. Also how good are your eyes man? I cannot see a date font from more than 3-5ft. And I do get what you are saying. I just want people to understand JF is not a horrible piece compared to ZF. So if you are like me and was told they dont have any and I already waited few months for other watches who were not avaliable I was ok with the flaws as most are on the JF. This is just so people who are new dont miss out on a good rep because they were told another is better but they even cannot tell. As it was told before the biggest tell you are wearing a rep is you. And also no one cares about your watch like you think. So relax and enjoy your time peace because it makes you happy. If you bought it to fake people maybe this isnt for you, what I mean is dont be fake.
What I said was sure the ZF may be a bit better, but if for some reason you cannot get it and want a good AP the JF is a good 2nd option.
Tan_Go i can't help with it but here's what I found after fiddling with the zf diver and an array of straps
Ok JF straps are a pita to mount (as if changing strap on an AP was a breeze anyway) because the hole on the zf plots is a tad higher /closer to the lugs. You need some extra force and I'm not really happy with that..
Gen croc straps and a roo gen rubber i have are perfectly fine no problem with it
Then as per mech500 request I tried a JF bracelet and it goes in like butter
Perfect fit no problem
So this led me to another test
I mounted jf plots into the zf diver and bingo they go in well and the jf straps can be mounted effortlessly
But in doing so I realized the metal bar which go in the strap holes from zf is a tad thicker than a JF (or maybe a cheap one I had I can't guarantee but all I have are likewise - except the only ZF) so I went back to zf plots and tried a JF strap with another rod and it was slightly easier to mount
So my findings for those tldr; folks like legend
: - jf strap by right not easy
- gen strap no prob
- jf bracelet no problem
- if you need jf xs best is to mount jf plots
Hope this helps