Pdatoon
Renowned Member
- 2/2/19
- 633
- 438
- 63
I don’t think it looks bad either. It’s perfectly typical of an AP bracelet-case fitment.
The thing is, gaps are present in the gen to varying degrees as well. Like any other matter, gen steel bracelets need to follow the laws of physics and nature and aren’t immune to stretching or becoming loose either. Show me a gen with a minimal gap and I can show you one with a larger gap. It’s just something very organic. The gaps between the links will also stretch over time. If you look at vintage Rolex bracelets you can easily see what I mean. They can look horrible and often do. Guys are just too picky about the bracelet gaps. I agree that when brand new the gen can have better bracelet fitment and finish but over time this becomes subject to normal wear and tear and hardly a concern. The bracelet edge and case gap in my gen 26237st looks worse than many watches shown here. I don’t really care. Gens aren’t perfect, so let’s not expect the reps to be either. It is perfectly ok of course to hold academic discourses/debates over details. It makes a very good read. It’s ok also not to buy a certain model over perceived flaws. This is personal and subjective.
But let’s be realistic and not expect every rep to be fulfilling standards on how we imagine perfection to look like. AP QC isn’t perfect and I can nitpick the heck out of the gens I own but I’ll rather just enjoy each watch as it is. If I can do that for $20-$100k+ watches, I can imagine it won’t be terribly difficult for anyone to do the same for a $500 watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Amen