Replisimio
I'm Pretty Popular
IIRC XF subs were not true 904l steel through and through, only the bracelet was 904l. Is it the same thing on their SD43?
No idea nor do I care really bud.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
IIRC XF subs were not true 904l steel through and through, only the bracelet was 904l. Is it the same thing on their SD43?
Arf v gen which is which lads?
Haha! Maybe you could add the XF to those pics bud, to give a quick comparison with all 3?
The steel grade is important for that last bit of gen presence. The bright color of 904L is key. The white color of 904 has a wow factor you can’t get from darker 316. I hope VS-XF did full 904L here.
I’ve had every ARF SD43 and the XF looks better in some details. I have an XF on order to see how much better it is overall.
This is not the arf thread buddy so why are you posting and talking about it. Take it from someone who knows these models well, XF beats it hands down on all details!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The steel grade is important for that last bit of gen presence. The bright color of 904L is key. The white color of 904 has a wow factor you can’t get from darker 316. I hope VS-XF did full 904L here.
Haha! Maybe you could add the XF to those pics bud, to give a quick comparison with all 3?
The lustre of this watch is well up to the job and I would imagine it is as stated, 904. I said I didn’t care as it looks bright and has that white lustre to it.
I’ve restored many gens Rolex over the years when I’ve sold them and there is a difference in the steel. 904 always responds better to polish and regardless of what some inexperienced muppets on here say, there is a difference when seen in the flesh. I’m glad you agree with me bud!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The steel grade is important for that last bit of gen presence. The bright color of 904L is key. The white color of 904 has a wow factor you can’t get from darker 316. I hope VS-XF did full 904L here.
I’ve had every ARF SD43 and the XF looks better in some details. I have an XF on order to see how much better it is overall.
People are going nuts in extremly small detail. I been looking at those photos and the only thing I can see between gen and arf is the crown between swiss made which I know ARF doesnt have. But majority of people will not notice. Only ones who work on one and see the smallest detail and people on rep forums lol. All I know is reps are amazing and only getting better. I am not dissapointed on my ARF. But I would have gotten this one if I knew about it.
Mate, there are other differences as well pointed out already like the CGs, the markers etc. The crown between swiss made is not there in 2017 models (which is what ARF replicated) and came in later models which XF is replicating. You are right majority of the folks won't notice. Folks on rep forums can make out the tells in the pics as they are close up shots and everything is magnified and compared with gen at times. At wrist level while some tells are obvious, most can't be made out unless you watch it up close or have a gen at hand. The reps are getting better and if they didnt then nobody would buy the newer versions (they do have a tendency to fix something and mess up something else which was fine previously but thats good for their business! If they made a perfect rep they would be out of business in no time!). Don't fret, soon enough a better rep than this might come out and then you would say if I knew I would have got that! ARF is a bloody god rep and wear it in good health! Cheers
I'm wondering if this XF is entering super rep status. There's not a lot wrong with it from the pics from a visual point of view. Lack of 3235 movt. might rule this out.
2824 is OK for a super rep as long as it has a steel back and crown height are same as gen. No rep will stand a check by a watchsmith and it doesn't need to to be a super rep. The XF's likely falling short with regards to the dial color and crystal/cyclops in a side by side comparison.