People -
I don't mean to set off a riot by yelling "this movie sucks" in a crowded theater, but can some one help me with the appeal of the Non-Navitimer Breitlings?
I'm just not getting it. ANd I'm not just referring to the reps. Even the genuine article holds no appeal (to me).
Here's my point: Breitling gets famous for designing a truly groundbreaking timepeice that aids aviators in calculating fuel consumption and other important math problems while airborne and they become synonymous with aviation timepieces. Then they make Navitimers for 30 years and stay famous. Fifty versions later, they decide, hey let's get into the non-aviator chunky watch business and make a bunch of plain old vanilla rotating bezel diver knock-offs and name them steelfish and blackbird and the like.
Now I'm partial to mechanicals so the idea that anyone would go and pay Breitling money or Omega money for one of these quartz gens is a complete outrage. Nice that they have automatic versions as well, but they poisoned the pot when they came out with the quartz versions IMO. Even the style ofe these watches wreaks of shopping mall quartz chronos that are a dime a dozen.
You guys snap them up if you like. I'm only about that Navi. And in the Rep world, I think the best way to go is the 6-9-12 Serie Speciale just because of the datewheel issue. They ain't perfect, but they aint $5000 either. I can't tell you I do a lot of fuel consumption calculations either, cause the only bird I fly is a glider... but I think I have lodged my greivance. Breitling could and should do better than these diamond crusted Bentley's and whatnot.
There. I've thrown the first grenade. What do people think?
YH 8)
I don't mean to set off a riot by yelling "this movie sucks" in a crowded theater, but can some one help me with the appeal of the Non-Navitimer Breitlings?
I'm just not getting it. ANd I'm not just referring to the reps. Even the genuine article holds no appeal (to me).
Here's my point: Breitling gets famous for designing a truly groundbreaking timepeice that aids aviators in calculating fuel consumption and other important math problems while airborne and they become synonymous with aviation timepieces. Then they make Navitimers for 30 years and stay famous. Fifty versions later, they decide, hey let's get into the non-aviator chunky watch business and make a bunch of plain old vanilla rotating bezel diver knock-offs and name them steelfish and blackbird and the like.
Now I'm partial to mechanicals so the idea that anyone would go and pay Breitling money or Omega money for one of these quartz gens is a complete outrage. Nice that they have automatic versions as well, but they poisoned the pot when they came out with the quartz versions IMO. Even the style ofe these watches wreaks of shopping mall quartz chronos that are a dime a dozen.
You guys snap them up if you like. I'm only about that Navi. And in the Rep world, I think the best way to go is the 6-9-12 Serie Speciale just because of the datewheel issue. They ain't perfect, but they aint $5000 either. I can't tell you I do a lot of fuel consumption calculations either, cause the only bird I fly is a glider... but I think I have lodged my greivance. Breitling could and should do better than these diamond crusted Bentley's and whatnot.
There. I've thrown the first grenade. What do people think?
YH 8)