- 9/9/19
- 2,298
- 1,697
- 113
it's fantastic .. I don't see any slightest flaw .. identical to the gen .. what do you think?
Have the same feeling, insane!
it's fantastic .. I don't see any slightest flaw .. identical to the gen .. what do you think?
Just dirt, that's common. The SEL could be better on those pics but on the wrist I think it should be just fine.Whats up with the 5 on the bezel insert
Yet you thought it would make more sense to quote post #99, a post with brushed links, to make that fantastic point.
Awesome. Thank you. I'm glad you're here
It's time to sell my gen.
Do a side by side comparison for us first
How do the bracelets on the VSF compare the ARF ones? Do I remember correctly that I read somewhere they are sourced from the same factory?
Clean use ARF bracelets, not VSF. Or at least they say the bracelet comes from the same vendor.
To me, it's just plain weird that you would advertise that half your watch was made by someone else - especially ARF, but whatever
A few years ago ARF bracelets were sublime, however, the quality now is nothing like it used to be.
Cheers mate.
Need to get my finger out now and get one of these non-dates ordered up. Look excellent.
Yes, it does look excellent. I actually prefer this in no-date form over the newer 124060.
While the slimmer lugs make for a more balanced watch, they also make it a lot more boring - there's just so little you can actually say about it...
Yes, it does look excellent. I actually prefer this in no-date form over the newer 124060.
While the slimmer lugs make for a more balanced watch, they also make it a lot more boring - there's just so little you can actually say about it...
Is it me or does this 114060 VSF have too much of a gap between bezel and rehaut? Busy with my qc atm…
Compare with post 115.
Its ok.
I'll be honest, I admit that I was looking forward to VSF's release of its 'no date', but I don't know why, but without the date display and cyclopean lens it seems a bit boring, but a lot 'cleaner'.